The Loebner prize is an annual competition in artificial intelligence (AI) where judges simultaneously have text based conversations with a computer program and a human being via a computer and they have to guess which one is which.
It is based on the Turing test, which originates from Alan Turing, who is widely considered to be the father of computing and AI, and was set up by New York businessman Hugh Loebner. The 2018 Loebner prize final is being held at Bletchley Park, where during the Second World War Turing helped crack the code on the German enigma machines. Four contestants have made it to the 2018 finals, being held on September 8 and WikiTribune will be attending.
The Turing test has been both highly influential and criticized. The Loebner prize, which is one interpretation of the test, has been called “a useful way to chart the progress of AI” by AI expert Noel Sharkey, and an “obnoxious and unproductive annual publicity campaign” by the late leading AI and philosophy researcher, Marvin Minsky.
Questions this article should seek to answer:
- Why is the Loebner prize useful in charting the progress of AI?
- What are the criticisms of the Loebner prize?
- How could the Loebner prize be improved?
- Has the Turing test already been passed (see Vox article) and if not when will it be?
add your suggestions here
add your suggestions hereEdit
- Steve Worswick, creator of chatbot ‘Mitsuku’, who has won the Loebner Prize three times and is one of the four contestants at this year’s final
- Ron Lee, creator of ‘Tutor’ – one of the four contestants at this year’s final
- Noel Sharkey, professor of artificial intelligence at the University of Sheffield
- Critic of the Loebener prize Hector Levesque, a University of Toronto computer scientist
Proposed questions for any interviewees
Add an interview suggestion or questionEdit