Russian dissidents focus on corruption ahead of presidential elections

The following has not yet been verified. Please improve it by logging in and editing it. If you believe that is not sufficient to solve the problem, please discuss it with the community on the Talk Page. If you think that this article should be removed, please contact [email protected]
  1. There has been a shift in public opinion in the last two years, specifically related to corruption.
  2. The internet in Russia has remained relatively unrestricted compared to other authoritarian regimes.
  3. While President Putin has mixed support on domestic issues, public approval on foreign policy remains high.

As the world focuses on Russia’s involvement in the 2016 U.S election, Russian dissidents are focused on the upcoming 2018 presidential election in Russia. The past year has been an important time for Russia’s political opposition with tens of thousands protesting President Vladimir Putin despite the risk of detention.

In March, over 60,000 people marched through Moscow with chants that included “Russia without Putin.” The protest was sparked by a YouTube video, titled “Don’t call him ‘Dimon’”, which details the lavish lifestyle of Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev who is suppose to live off of a government salary.

The 50-minute video takes a light-hearted tone as it lists the price tags of Medvedev’s clothing and his properties in Italy. It ends with Alexey Navalny, the creator of the video and director of the Anti-Corruption Foundation, saying: “This is the main reason why our country as a whole is very rich, but people who live here are very poor.”

As of October, the video has over 24 million views.

The March demonstration is considered to be the largest in Russia since allegations of election fraud in 2011. Leaders of the opposition are now trying to sustain this momentum on social media, and keep the national narrative focused on the issue that generated the recent episode of public outrage – corruption.

Pew Research June 2017

President Putin continues to enjoy strong support among Russians. But there has been a shift in public opinion in the last two years, specifically related to corruption.

A Pew Research poll in June revealed that 45 percent of Russians disapprove of his regime’s handling of government corruption. That’s up from 29 percent in 2015 Pew poll. This comes while 53 percent of the population view wealth inequality as a serious issue.

Navalny’s viral video was not reported on by the major broadcast and print media outlets in Russia, nor were the subsequent protests. Russia ranks 148 out of 180 countries in terms of press freedom, according to Reporters Without Borders. Russian journalists have reported government interference in newsrooms. Foreigners cannot own more than 20 percent of a Russian-based media ventures, limiting the ways independent journalism can survive in Russia.

With legacy media being limited, social media has become one of the few channels where activists can disseminate information to the estimated 84 million Russians with daily internet access.

The internet in Russia has remained relatively unrestricted compared to other authoritarian regimes. International social media platforms, like Facebook and Twitter, are still accessible in Russia, which is not the case in China.

Russia is beginning to control online spaces more now. The Kremlin has removed online content that it finds objectionable. However, Google has so far fought requests to restrict YouTube in Russia.

Opposition Looks for Help Abroad

The Kremlin has yet to announce any punitive action against Prime Minister Medvedev or other officials who may use government funds for personal gain. Some activists believe that the international community has a role in their push for anti-corruption reforms.

Vladimir Kara-Murza is the vice chairman of Open Russia, a foundation that assists young democratic activists. He often conducts what he refers to as “international outreach”, lobbying foreign governments and human rights advocates to diplomatically and economically isolate President Putin’s government. Kara-Murza specifically advocates for tightening any sanction that target oligarchs and others associated with the Russian government.

John McCain on Twitter

Vladimir Kara-Murza is a Russian patriot who will never stop fighting for a future in which his beautiful children can live in freedom.

In 2012, his testimony to the U.S. Congress contributed to the passage of the Magnitsky Act, which established a blacklist for Russian leaders associated with human rights abuses. Kara-Murza firmly believes that his lobbying effort led to him being poisoned twice by the Kremlin, who is dependent on using oligarchs to reach the global marketplace despite sanctions.

“…if you violate the most basic norms and principles of the democratic world, you shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy the privileges that the democratic world has to offer,” Kara-Murza told WikiTribune. “And these people want to steal in Russia but spend in the West.”

The challenge is keeping the sanction efforts tied to the opposition’s larger focus corruption. While President Putin has mixed support on domestic issues, public approval on foreign policy remains extraordinarily high. The same 2017 Pew Research survey that found a spike in public concern over corruption in Russia also revealed that 87 percent of Russia had confidence that Putin was doing “the right thing in world affairs.”

The international community is divided on whether to further isolate President Putin’s government. President Donald J. Trump has advocated for improved relations with Russia but also signed a bill in August that applied additional sanctions against it. Leaders of the European Union have also voiced opposition to increased sanctions on Russia, considering Europe’s dependence on Russia for energy needs.

Kara-Murza is frustrated by the assumption that geopolitics and economics always overshadow a country’s human rights record. In this way, he yearns for U.S. leadership during the Cold War.

“Ronald Reagan could at the same time negotiate arms control with the Soviet Union and begin every meeting with the Soviet leadership with a list of Russian political prisoners,” he says.

“I mean we live in the 21st century now. I think it’s generally accepted that the only real form of government, of legitimacy of a government is democratic election.”

  • TODO tags

      Is there a problem with this article? [Join] today to let people know and help build the news.
      • Share
        Share

      Subscribe to our newsletter

      Be the first to collaborate on our developing articles

      WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Connect with us on Discord Email us