The following has not yet been verified. Please improve it by logging in and editing it. If you believe that is not sufficient to solve the problem, please discuss it with the community on the Talk Page. If you think that this article should be removed, please contact [email protected]
  1. Various theories spread to undermine UK stance on attack on Skripals
  2. UK Foreign Secretary under pressure to clarify evidence
  3. Deniability key to hybrid warfare

This article does not yet have a title. Add one!


Since fingers pointed toward Russia after an attack against a former double agent in Britain, dozens of alternative theories have been proposed by figures linked to the Kremlin. Experts told WikiTribune the allegations fit an established pattern of Russian disinformation campaigns that should be met with careful and transparent use of facts.

Sergei and Yulia Skripal were attacked in the English city of Salisbury on March 4, perhaps because Yulia was engaged and the mother of her future husband disapproved of the match, reports Moscow newspaper

Alternatively, the attack was ordered by UK Prime Minister Theresa May, on the request of her friend Gina Haspel, the proposed CIA Director, according to TV Zvedza, a network run by Russia’s Ministry of Defence.

In fact, the UK government might have ordered the attack to distract the public from how poorly they are doing in their negotiations with the EU on Brexit, suggested Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. His spokesperson also suggested Britain is trying to isolate Russia so it cannot host the World Cup.

EUvsDisinfo, a European Union-backed website, has tracked at least 25 alternative theories propagated by pro-Kremlin officials and media over the use of a nerve agent against former double agent Skripal and his daughter.

The UK government was quick to say they had concluded the attack was either ordered by the Russian government or the Kremlin was otherwise responsible. Russia has consistently denied involvement as the incident escalated into a diplomatic crisis, with 24 countries, plus the UK, expelling Russian diplomats.

Russia has consistently said the UK’s allegations are unfounded, and demanded access to the investigation.

Experts said…


Stick to the facts

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has been criticized by opponents who say he misled the public when telling German broadcaster Deutsche Welle that Porton Down chemical weapons experts had told him the nerve agent definitely came from Russia.

The head of the government laboratory told Sky News that the nerve agent could not be directly traced back to Russia, and the organization tweeted that establishing the source of the nerve agent is not its responsibility.

Russia is expected to try to discredit the UK’s allegations at a UN Security Council meeting it called to discuss the diplomatic crisis, to be held on April 5.

Ben Nimmo, an expert in information and disinformation at Washington D.C.-based think tank Atlantic Council, told WikiTribune the

Boris – Nimmo


Fits a pattern – rferl, nimmo pudd

Officials and state-backed news outlets RT and Sputnik


  • TODO tags

      Is there a problem with this article? [Join] today to let people know and help build the news.
      • Share

      Subscribe to our newsletter

      Be the first to collaborate on our developing articles

      WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Connect with us on Discord Email us