Talk for Article "The era of quantum computing? Not quite yet"

Talk about this Article

  1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    “To put speed into perspective, in 2015, Google published a paper saying that its quantum computer was 100 million times faster than a classical computer.”

    Isn’t it misleading to suggest that Google have a computer that is 100 million times faster than a conventional computer or am I misreading this paragraph?

  2. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    This literally is the best summarization of quantum computing. The links really help too!

  3. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    The biggest issue with that, Not many profs available to actually teach how to use one. It is the upcoming thing, but the thought so far is mostly below rudimentary.
    Great article!

    1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

      That’s a good point Robert – have you yourself tried out IBM Q? Would love to hear your experience if so.

      And thank you!

  4. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    That’s the best article I have ever read on quantum computing.

    1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

      Thank you Conall, I’m touched by your reply 🙂

  5. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    Thanks for one of the most balanced reports on Q computing I’ve seen.

    1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

      Thank you James, I’m glad you thought so!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Be the first to collaborate on our developing articles

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Connect with us on Discord Email us