Spain |Analysis

Different perceptions of democracy underpin stand-off in Catalonia

Talk (4)


Joan Pla

"Hi Andrew, First of all, thanks for ..."
Andrew Bernstein

Andrew Bernstein

"Hello Joan, Thank you for your com..."

Joan Pla

"The last paragraph contradicts the se..."

Nino Dvoršak


Elections on December 21, 2017, in Catalonia only contributed to maintain  Spain’s political stalemate. While the biggest individual winner was the pro-constitution and anti-nationalist party Ciudadanos, pro-independence parties (ERC, Junts per Catalunya and CUP) garnered enough votes to revalidate their majority in the Catalan parliament.

The stand-off displays two contrasting definitions of democracy: for the pro-independence movement, it is that of self-determination. For the Spanish government, it is the rule of law directed by a constitution approved by the constituents.

Since last October, when he fled to Belgium under fear of arrest, former Catalonian president Carles Puigdemont has claimed to still be the legitimate leader. Recently he pleaded that he be allowed return to be proclaimed president. He had been nominated by the Speaker of the new Catalan parliament, Roger Torrent.

However, the Spanish government has repeatedly argued that it will block any attempt to nominate him, and were he to set afoot in the country he would immediately be placed under arrest. It denies any possibility of a president in absentia. On the other hand, Madrid claims it will respect any pro-independence candidate who is not under investigation. Is Puigdemont the legitimate leader of Catalonia? The answer depends on one’s interpretation of democracy.

Although the waters seem to have calmed, the Catalan autonomous region still lacks a government, and another institutional confrontation is in place. While both sides accuse each other of being anti-democratic, this political crisis stems from two very different understandings.

What is liberal democracy?

What constitutes a liberal democracy? According to political theorist Robert Dahl, a liberal democracy stems from a number of equally important characteristics: governmental decision-making is constitutionally vested in elected officials; officials are elected in frequent, free and fair popular polls; all adult citizens have voting rights and civil rights; all adult citizens have the right to run for public office and be elected; full freedom of speech and expression for all without retribution; free and uncensored information and media sources, protected and available to citizens; citizens have the right of association and can form political parties or interest groups with equal access.

Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, who studied political transitions to democracy, concluded that there needs to be a clear and effective separation of powers and the rule of law. This is to guarantee the rights and liberties of the people. Although there is no such thing as a perfect democracy, the more closely a state meets all these equally important conditions, the more democratic its system is.

For Catalan pro-independence supporters, the Spanish state is far from fully democratic. The pro-independence campaigners claim that they have a legitimate right to decide their political and national future through self-determination: a universal right fully recognized by the United Nations which states that “a people, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity, have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and international political status with no interference”. In September 2017, almost 82 percent of the Catalan people believed that it was Catalonia’s legitimate right to hold a binding referendum on independence. The referendum took place on October 1.

The Spanish state had repeatedly rejected the possibility of a referendum. Madrid’s argument is that such a measure is not included in the country’s constitution, which says the only authority to call a binding referendum is the central government.

On the other hand, those parties in Catalonia and the rest of Spain which support the constitution argue that it is the pro-independence side who is anti-democratic and has broken the established norms of coexistence. This argument stems from the firm believe in the rule of law, a law established by Spain’s 1978 constitution (supported by more than 90 percent of Catalan voters at the time) which they argue was designed to guarantee that all Spanish citizens have equal rights and duties. Therefore, when the Catalan pro-independence parties decided to break the “Estatut” (the legal political framework for Catalonia), they overstepped the law and undermined the rights of the rest of the Catalan and Spanish citizens. The clash was set up, and images of Spanish police brutally cracking down on those Catalan people who decided to vote on October 1 are now part of the country’s history.

After the vote, in which close to 43 percent of the Catalan electorate voted (90 percent of them in favor of seceding) the Catalan political leaders declared Catalonia’s unilateral independence on October 27. The Spanish government immediately condemned the move, and the Spanish constitutional court once again declared it illegal. Mariano Rajoy, Spain’s prime minister, proceeded to dismiss the entire autonomous government and apply constitutional article 155, which allows the central government to directly intervene and take over any autonomous government that acts against the state. The Spanish courts ordered the immediate arrest of the Catalan leaders in charge of the unilateral declaration of independence and new autonomous elections were called.

Political prisoners – or not

While some of the most important Catalan cabinet members were arrested and placed in jail, Puigdemont and a few of his “consellers” escaped to Brussels to avoid prosecution. Again, a battle was in place to claim for democratic legitimacy: are the politicians who have been arrested political prisoners?

A political prisoner is a person who is imprisoned for his political beliefs or actions. The Spanish government and international and independent organizations such as Amnesty International have rejected the allegations (link to La Vanguardia in Spanish) that the Catalan political leaders are political prisoners, for they had clearly been able to defend their ideas and beliefs freely before breaking the law.

However, pro-independence supporters consider them to be the victims of an anti-democratic backlash by the Spanish state, which they claim lacks an independent judiciary system (see my previous article on the alleged lack of independence of the judiciary system). While some of them have been released (those who abandoned the unilateral declaration of independence and will abide by the constitution) four of the main leaders remain in jail awaiting trial.


Started by

I am a Political Scientist who specializes in Public Opinion, Direct Democracy and Political Misperceptions. I have a passion for international politics and believe community-based journalism with an emphasis on critical thinking and perspectivism is greatly needed. My thesis analyzed political misperceptions during the Brexit referendum campaign. I became interested in this topic when I realized that a great number of people had been manipulated during the campaign and that there was a great chance this had affected the referendum´s outcome. In a world dominated by terms like fake news and post-truth, I aim to analyze how people process information and form their political beliefs using quantitative and qualitative methods.

History for stories "Different perceptions of democracy underpin stand-off in Catalonia"

Select two items to compare revisions

13 February 2018

06:39:48, 13 Feb 2018 . .‎ Charles Anderson (Updated → update)

12 February 2018

15:10:01, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → avoiding two Spains in head)
15:07:48, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → pubbing)
15:07:21, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → Ciudadanos link)
14:32:01, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → which)
14:29:24, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → trim)
14:28:44, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → final links)
14:20:12, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → thumbnail)
14:18:03, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → links to WT coverage)
14:15:07, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → avoiding repetition)
14:13:16, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → removing repetition)
14:07:55, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → moving copy)
14:04:22, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → trim to avoid widow)
14:03:44, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → nut graf)
11:27:48, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → bold first par)
11:27:26, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → Stepan and Linz link)
09:54:30, 12 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → copy edits and moving pars)

08 February 2018

16:10:04, 08 Feb 2018 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → hold - Angela editing, talking to Andy)
15:32:37, 08 Feb 2018 . .‎ Andrew Bernstein (Updated → Battle for Democratic Legitimacy)

Talk for Story "Different perceptions of democracy underpin stand-off in Catalonia"

Talk about this Story

  1. Flagged as bias

    The last paragraph contradicts the second-last paragrap, which implies they are not “political prisoners”:

    “A political prisoner is a person who is imprisoned for his political beliefs or actions” = “While some of them have been released (those who abandoned the unilateral declaration of independence and will abide by the constitution)…”

    So, actually, they are indeed imprisoned for their political beliefs. Please, correct me if I’m wrong.

    1. Rewrite

      Hello Joan,

      Thank you for your comment. I think that the definition of “political prisoners” implies that they are people who are imprisoned for their beliefs and political ideology. In this case, these Catalan politicians were able to defend their ideas in the Catalan parliament and society very freely before the (according to Spanish law) illegal referendum that took place on October 1st. While I agree that imprisonment for these political actions is extreme, I would not classify them as political prisoners myself. When there is an established legal framework and people decide to act against it, they must acknowledge that they are bound to be held responsible for their actions. Furthermore, the arrests were ordered by judges, and the Catalan leaders are awaiting trial. The fact that those leaders who decided to abandon the unilateral declaration of independence have been released has to do, in my opinion, with the observation by the judges that they won´t persevere in the (according to Spanish law) illegal actions that caused their arrest in the first place.

      1. Rewrite

        Hi Andrew,
        First of all, thanks for your reply. I don’t agree with you but I think this is not the right place to discuss the issue. We should leave to the readers the consideration of whether they are political prisoners. The article should reflect just the facts.
        Actually, the text should be updated as last Friday the judge decided to jail the leaders you mention (those who explicitly decided to abandon the unilateral declaration of independence and were first left free with bail).

Subscribe to our newsletter and be the first to collaborate on our developing stories:

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later