Suffragettes,_England,_1908
Gender |Analysis

100 years after suffrage, UK women still chase equality

  1. Representation of the People Act gave limited suffrage to women over 30
  2. 'Still a massive under-representation' of women in power roles
  3. Men's activists call for minister for men to balance minister for women
  4. 'Democracy matters more for women because we had to fight for it' - MP

One hundred years since women won the right to vote in the United Kingdom from the sacrifices – even death – of suffragettes, a modern group of women’s rights activists and politicians see themselves still on the frontline of a struggle for equal rights.

A mainstream feminist movement which bridges party lines sees much still to do in a country which now has a woman prime minister and had arguably the best-known female leader of the 20th Century – Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher knew she was a role model but never considered herself a feminist.

The women leading the political and social struggle for equality are far more explicit about the feminist goals at the heart of their campaigns.

“Women are not equal in politics, we are not equally represented, we are not equally powerful,” said Jess Phillips, Labour Party member of parliament for Birmingham Yardley. She says she feels strongly influenced by the suffrage movement and argues that the power imbalance between the sexes creates a climate for exploitation, such as sexual harassment.

Despite Theresa May becoming the UK’s second female prime minister in 2016, women remain under-represented in British politics. Women make up 32 percent of the House of Commons after the 2017 general election and 26 percent of the House of Lords, parliament’s upper house which is record representation.

“There are more women in parliament than ever before … and what we’re seeing is a lot of strong women are making their voices heard and having a real impact,” said Andrew Bazeley, policy and insight manager at women’s rights organization The Fawcett Society, named after suffragist Dame Millicent Garrett Fawcett. Women are yet to reach equal representation in politics and other fields.

Theresa May, Prime Minister, United Kingdom. Photo by: Arno Mikkor via Flickr, used under Creative Commons license CC BY 2.0
Theresa May, the second ever female prime minister of the United Kingdom. The first was Margaret Thatcher. Photo by: Arno Mikkor via Flickr, used under Creative Commons license CC BY 2.0

A century of female suffrage

On February 6, 1918, with the passing of the Representation of the People Act, the right to vote and stand in elections was given to women over the age of 30 who owned property – 40 percent of Britain’s total population of women at the time – and to all men over the age of 21. This was 25 years after then-British colony New Zealand granted women the franchise, two years before women in the United States, and almost 100 years before women in Saudi Arabia, who were granted the right to vote and stand in elections in 2015.

Women’s suffrage, the right to vote in elections, was the sole goal of the militant suffragettes and law-abiding suffragists across the world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Thousands of British women were imprisoned during the movement, often symbolized by the death of Emily Wilding Davison, a prominent suffragette who ran into the path of King George V’s horse at the 1913 Epsom Derby. She was waving a suffrage flag at the fatal moment.

Despite a century of women’s suffrage in Britain – full suffrage for all men and women wasn’t achieved until 1928 – politicians and academics interviewed by WikiTribune argued that they’re a long way from achieving equal rights between the sexes. They said many British women remain disenfranchised. Revelations of systemic sexual harassment in Westminster and wider society indicate problems quite separate from achieving a presence in politics.

Suffragettes marching with flags to display their prison status. Pankhurst and her daughters were arrested on numerous occasions and, like many suffragettes, spent long periods in prison. Photo by: Julie Jordan Scott via Flickr
Suffragettes marching with flags to display their prison status. Around one thousand British suffragettes spent long periods in prison. Photo by: Julie Jordan Scott via Flickr

Parliament Square outside the Palace of Westminster has 11 statues of notable men from Winston Churchill to Nelson Mandela. The first statue of a woman, suffragist Millicent Fawcett, will be erected this year to mark the centenary.

The UK still has a long way to go for gender equality to be achieved, according to the European gender equality survey. This considers equality policy, numbers of women in power, and economic differences between men and women: the UK trails Sweden, Finland, The Netherlands and Denmark.

Suffragette city

“Across the board if you look at the Cabinet, the local government, police and crime commissioners [and] elected mayors, there’s still a massive under-representation of women in those roles,” said Bazeley from the Fawcett Society. “So whilst you have universal suffrage there’s a real need for us to do more to get women to stand [and] make sure the establishment is not designed with men in mind.” Basics like maternity leave and reasonable childcare are obstacles.

There are no formal arrangements on maternity, paternity, parental, adoption, or caring leave for British MPs. However MPs backed “baby leave”, a process that would allow new parents to nominate someone to vote in parliament on their behalf.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern made headlines in January with her pregnancy. Reacting to questions of whether she could somehow manage the premiership as well, she made clear she was “pregnant, not incapacitated.”

A suffragette meeting in Manchester, England circa 1908. Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence and Emmeline Pankhurst stand in the center of the platform. Photo by: The New York Times photo archive available in the public domain
A suffragette meeting in Manchester, England circa 1908. Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence and Emmeline Pankhurst stand in the center of the platform. Photo: The New York Times photo archive, public domain

The drive towards gender equality, particularly the feminist movement and recognition of gender variety, has triggered counter-responses.

“We’re seeing huge backlash against women in power,” Bazeley said. “There is resistance to women making their voices heard.”

Some men say they feel victimized by the drive towards extra rights for women.

“In 100 years the gender pendulum has swung from one extreme with regard to family, which was patriarchal, where men and fathers had all the power over women, to another extreme where, certainly in the area of family law, women have all the power, women have all the control and fathers have absolutely no rights,” said Matt O’Connor, the founder of Fathers4Justice, an equal-parenting campaign launched 16 years ago. It made headlines with a variety of stunts in which its activists scaled major buildings or carried out protests wearing superhero costumes.

“The pursuit of equality for some people has now become … a journey from the oppressed to oppressor,” O’Connor said, likening the new era of the women’s movement to a “witch hunt” against men.

O’Connor wants the government to create a post of minister for men and boys. “How can you have a minister for women and equalities, but no minister for men? I don’t get it, I just don’t buy it … It’s deeply irresponsible, deeply irresponsible.”

The murder in 2016 of MP Jo Cox, who was shot and stabbed by a man shouting “This is for Britain”, is an example of the backlash against women making their voices heard, Bazeley said.

Matt O'Connor (center) at a Fathers4Justice protest in London. Photo by: Garry Clarkson and provided by Matt O'Connor
Matt O’Connor (center) at a Fathers4Justice protest in London. Photo by: Garry Clarkson, courtesy Matt O’Connor

Online abuse of women is widespread in the UK, according to human rights organization Amnesty International. Black, Asian and minority ethnic women MPs take the brunt of that, according to an Amnesty study. Labour Party MP and Shadow Home Secretary, Diane Abbott, the first black woman to hold a seat in the House of Commons, received almost a third of all abuse on Twitter aimed at women MPs in the run up to the 2017 general election.

Racial and sexual equality

Suffrage was achieved with the involvement of men and women from diverse social, political and religious backgrounds and from all over the British Empire, including people of color such as prominent Indian suffragette Princess Sophia Duleep Singh, according to the Fawcett Society. The British suffrage movement was more inclusive than similar movements in Australia or the United States, it says.

“There were a lot of women of color who were key in the suffrage campaign,” the Fawcett Society’s Bazeley said. “There were men of color MPs before women of color got the vote,” he said, citing the first ethnic minority MP to be elected, Dadabhai Naoroji, who was MP for Central Finsbury in London in 1892.

The rise of the concept of “intersectional feminism”, which considers racism and sexism together in the quest for equal rights, has uncovered what its supporters see as the whitewashing of parts of the women’s rights movement.

Actors in the 2015 movie Suffragette which starred Carey Mulligan and Meryl Streep were criticized for racial insensitivity when promotional posters featured the all-white cast wearing T-shirts that read “I’d rather be a rebel than a slave” (Irish Times).

Jess Phillips, Member of Parliament for Birmingham Yardley, has been a vocal proponent of women's rights. Photo by: Chris McAndrew for the UK government. Used under Creative Commons license CC BY 3.0
Jess Phillips, Member of Parliament for Birmingham Yardley, has been a vocal proponent of women’s rights. Photo by: Chris McAndrew for the UK government. Used under Creative Commons license CC BY 3.0

The most pressing issue is “pervasive” violence against women, according to Helen Pankhurst, a women’s rights activist and great-granddaughter of suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst. She sees a spectrum of violence against women from rape, domestic violence, sexual harassment to female genital mutilation. “Violence affects women’s experiences and engagement in politics, violence affects women at work, violence affects women at home, violence affects women in the cultural spheres.” She also sees the objectification of women, driven in part by pornography, as a crisis. See interview with Helen Pankhurst.

“It’s if anything worse than it was 100 years ago,” said Pankhurst.

Violence against women and girls is “endemic”, a Fawcett Society report found earlier this year.

‘Democracy matters more for women because we had to fight for it’ – Jess Phillips MP

Prominent women might attract hateful attacks, but the situation is worse for those who are out of the public eye. Women of color, working-class women and disabled women are discriminated against at a higher rate, said MP Jess Phillips, who is part of a cross-party group of MPs working to address sexual harassment in parliament (The Guardian).

“There’s so much to do. It’s like Whack-A-Mole,” she told WikiTribune.

Suffragette Katherine Douglas Smith speaks to a crowd of men, c.1906-1914. Photo by: LSE women's library collection, no copyright restrictions
Suffragette Katherine Douglas Smith speaks to a crowd of men in English harbor town Portsmouth, c.1906-1914. Photo by: LSE women’s library collection via Flickr, no copyright restrictions

The only way the gender imbalance is going to change in politics, Phillips said, is if women are given more jobs. Women in Westminster also need to have posts that aren’t female-focused, she said, such as in the department for exiting the EU, which has one woman minister. “It doesn’t just mean pushing women forward, it means men taking a side-step and letting them all pass them.”

Phillips said she uses the suffragette legacy to inspire her female constituents today. “Democracy matters more for women because we had to fight for it, it wasn’t given to us … And it’s something that I try and evoke in women on the doorstep who say they’re not going to vote. I will say, you know, people died for you to vote – women literally died for us to be able to vote.”

What or who would you add to this story? Use EDIT to add directly or tell us in TALK

We have no ads and no paywall. If you believe in collaboration to produce quality neutral journalism for everyone, it is important that you sign up to support our work financially. Every penny goes towards improving WikiTribune!
Thanks, Jimmy Wales

Support us

Talk (20)

Lydia Morrish

Lydia Morrish

"Please feel free to elaborate on the ..."
AH

Alan Henness

"Thanks. It'll need to wait till Thurs..."
Lydia Morrish

Lydia Morrish

"Hi Alan, best way is to probably star..."
AH

Alan Henness

"Lydia I may be able to write a sho..."

Sources & References

Other notable female leaders from the last 100 years we felt we wanted to include but who didn’t fit into the story itself:


Author

United Kingdom
Lydia is a staff journalist at WikiTribune, where she writes about politics, women's rights, inequality, sexual politics and more. Previously she headed up the women’s rights and political content at Konbini for over two years. In 2016, she made ‘Building Big’, a documentary about bigorexia and male body image. Her work has also been published in Dazed & Confused, Refinery29, Vice, Lyra, Banshee and Buffalo Zine. She is based in London.

History for Story "100 years after suffrage, UK women still chase equality"

Select two items to compare revisions

  1. Time Contributor Edit
  2. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Updating summary
  3. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) Adding detail about Indian-British suffragette Princess Sophia Duleep Singh
  4. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding other notable women leaders
  5. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) correcting spelling "disenfranchised"
  6. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding main image into story
  7. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) new feature image
  8. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) standfirst removing extra word
  9. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) Fixing image caption
  10. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) Adding image of Theresa May
  11. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) Adding link to Millicent Fawcett, updating date
  12. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Publishing
  13. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) removing empty spaces
  14. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) Images
  15. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) changing main image
  16. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) small edits before going live, and adding images
  17. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Hold for Tuesday edit
  18. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Working copy
  19. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) photo credit
  20. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trim
  21. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trim
  22. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) final trim
  23. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) Femen link
  24. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) peculiar sentence on child-bearing
  25. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) O'Connor pic
  26. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) summary change
  27. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) moving J Phillips quote
  28. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trim
  29. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trimming
  30. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trimming due to repetition (sexual harrassment in W'minster)
  31. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) trimming
  32. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) clearing jargon
  33. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) tightening
  34. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) adding main piece
  35. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) pasting in main piece
  36. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) making the horse sound less guilty
  37. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Updated headline
  38. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) correcting spelling of Davison
  39. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding that 1918 Act only represented some women
  40. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) tweak
  41. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk)
  42. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Shortened intro
  43. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding details about interviewees
  44. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding featured image
  45. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) My version
  46. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) WikiProject to experiment with format
  47. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) added New Zealand
  48. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding interview rqeusts
  49. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) tweaks
  50. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) tweak of intro
  51. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) tweak of call out language
  52. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) call out
  53. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) change phrasing of call out
  54. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) moving bullet point
  55. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) edits
  56. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) adding statistics
  57. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk) headline
  58. Lydia Morrish Lydia Morrish (Contributions | Talk)

Talk for Story "100 years after suffrage, UK women still chase equality"

Talk about this Story

  1. I’m a newcomer to Wikitribune and I don’t have any experience in journalism. Is this story focused mainly on the women’s right movement in Great Britain or Europe? If it is, would information about what happened and is still happening in the USA be relevant?

    One aspect in the USA that I find intriguing is the work of the League of Women Voters. This is what at least some of the women’s suffrage organizations turned themselves into once we won the right to vote. The League continues to work for expanded voting rights. Given current efforts to disenfranchise more and more people through such things as voter id laws and gerrymandering, the League’s work is urgent and timely.

    1. Dorit, the piece is now published if you’d like to take a look!

    2. Thanks Dorit, welcome to WikiTribune! The piece will focus on the UK but will show the echoes of the suffragette movement worldwide, if there’s room!

    3. Absolutely. There are certainly things specific to various countries, but, although some progress is being made, many events in different parts of the world are very worrying and threaten many hard-won equality gains.

      1. Hi Alan, the piece is now published if you’d like to take a look.

        1. Excellent, Lydia.

          There could be a place for an article on the problems surrounding trans women, but I think it would need to be separate from this as it would simply detract from main story about the women’s equality.

        2. Excellent! Reading through it now.

          I know Wikitribune mostly wants US spellings, but Is ‘disenfranchized’ really spelled with a z in the US? To me, that looks completely wrong!

          1. 🙂

            We’re used to seeing many US spellings – Noah has got a lot to answer for – but that grated quite a bit!

          2. You are right! Just checked and its “disenfranchise” in the U.S. too. Will correct now – good spot.

  2. An important current topic in this area is that of proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act in the UK that are likely to allow people to ‘self-identify’ as a different gender and that this will become a protected characteristic under equality legislation.

    There are a number of issues this raises (many of which are already causing arguments and debates before the consultation has been formally announced), including the acceptance of males who self-identify as women on All-Women Shortlists for elections (see the current rows in the Labour Party over this and the election of a male to the position of Women’s Officer in a Constituency Labour Party), the problems of males who self-identify as women (or even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate) being allowed to use what are usually considered safe spaces for females, such as refuges, changing rooms, female prisons (eg Martin Ponting), etc.

    All these issues are a great concerns to females and it’s likely that there will be a lot more media attention.

    One aspect needs particular understanding is that these concerns are not against trans people – and indeed many trans people think that self-identification is not the right way to go .

    Also, I suggest particular caution and sensitivity in the use of language: this concerns the meaning of the words male/female (relating to biological sex) and man/woman (these can be used to mean the male/female of the human species but also the gender of people) and the use of personal pronouns – some people, whether they consider themselves to be trans or not (eg non-binary, queer or any other of the plethora of terms used) can be particular as to what pronouns are used for them (he, she, zi, hir, they, etc)

    Many feminists are very worried that recent events and possible future changes will undo many of the advances made to women’s suffrage and will simply increase misogyny and oppression of women.

    This is a big but important area and I can provide more details if required.

    Is this something we should cover?

    1. This is definitely an interesting part of recent movements in gender rights. I will try to find a way to include it. I’d be interested to see more information on this if you are around!

      1. Thanks, Lydia.

        I suggest this website: http://www.peaktrans.org

        Full disclosure: note that this is my wife’s website: she was assaulted by three trans activists at Speakers’ Corner last September – one person is due to appear in court in a few weeks in relation to this incident. However, I think the information on the site is very good and outlines the very many issues.

      2. Here is a draft of the story I’m currently working on. I’d love for you to contribute and add in a bit about the Gender Recognition Act amendments! https://www.wikitribune.com/?post_type=stories&p=45847&preview=true

        1. Sorry, Lydia, not had a moment to do anything, but this Times article today covers a good number of the issues:

          Labour’s purge of the trans-rights heretics

          https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/labour-s-purge-of-the-trans-rights-heretics-p32khgn36

          I assume you have access to it?

          1. Hey Alan, no worries about not having time. I will take a look at the article, thank you.

            1. Lydia

              I may be able to write a short report on something happening next week that is relevant to this but I’d like to get your view on it and some advice first. If you’re interested, what’s the best way to do that?

              1. Hi Alan, best way is to probably start a story and put all the info in there and I can take a look. It’s okay if it’s note form or half-baked. Then link it here so I can see.

                1. Thanks. It’ll need to wait till Thursday before I publish anything – it’s a court case and we obviously don’t know how the defendant will plead. The main body will be much the same regardless but will adjust the headline/standfirst/body as required. A demonstration outside the court has been called by supporters of the accused although we don’t know how many will turn up. If there is a good crowd, it’s possible other outlets will cover it.

                  1. Please feel free to elaborate on the case on here or on my profile talk page – if you are able.

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu RSS Feed Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later