A man walks among yellowfin tuna at the fishing port of Donggang, Pingtung county, southern Taiwan
Environment |Report

Big read: Murder and abuse – the price of your sashimi

  1. Tuna "gold rush" brings thousands to South Pacific
  2. Chinese captain murdered and put on ice
  3. 'Mutiny on Bounty' island at center of murder mystery
  4. Observers and fishermen lost in suspicious circumstances
  5. 'Human life is worth less than the fish they pursue'

The last great tuna rush in the world’s oceans is underway in the South Pacific. Tuna stocks are being plundered and those meant to protect them are dying mysterious deaths far from shore while fishermen live and die in appalling conditions.

At least eight fisheries observers — mostly recruited from South Pacific states with an interest in the exploitation of tuna — have died in mysterious circumstances over the past five years, based on reports and my own extensive research.

Fishermen too have fallen victim to the hunger for tuna that has sent thousands of boats into the region, with crews in virtual slavery, reluctant to admit the scale of the fishing going on — far in excess of what is agreed or approved.

Legal recourse on the high seas is a murky world where borders are hard to define and justice hard to come by — even in the case of murder.

A murder at sea

As 46-year-old skipper Xie Dingrong lay in his bunk he might have reflected on how tough it was to bring sashimi from the seas of the South Pacific to the world.

He had been on the ocean for months on a tuna longline fishing boat, one of the 15 million people working full time in what the International Labour Organization (ILO) reckons is one of world’s most dangerous jobs.

By 9pm on September 7, 2016, he was asleep in his cabin, on the high seas between Fiji and Easter Island. Six men, armed with fish gutting knives, scissors and a hammer, entered and, according to court documents, stabbed and slashed at Xie.

A post mortem report, presented to the Vanuatu Supreme Court nearly a year later, showed the dead skipper’s body had 41 wounds to his head, neck and body, causing massive hemorrhaging. He had what the report termed “defence wounds” on his arms and hands, showing he had fought to survive.

But despite his efforts, Xie’s wife back in Fuijan, China, would become a widow. Their 12-year-old child would start at middle-school without a father.

As Xie’s bleeding body was stacked in a freezer with tuna, the ship, Tunago 61, was 1,100 kilometres away from land. That was off Pitcairn Island, which more than 200 years earlier, had become a bolt hole for Fletcher Christian and the men of the 1789 Mutiny on the Bounty.

Vanuatu flagged fishing boat Tunago 61. Photo sourced from its licensing document filed with the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 

Despite the curious irony, according to myriad reports, including my own extensive investigations into the industry, conditions on many fishing boats these days could be considered worse than that aboard Royal Navy ships 200 years ago.

Xie, however, was both a victim and a perpetrator. Xie’s killers would face harsh justice in a country they had never been to, but it would also be revealed that Xie was, in part, responsible for his own fate thanks to sustained “discrimination, mistreatment and verbal and physical abuse … over an extended period,” of his crew, according to a Vanuatu supreme court document.

Disappeared

The environmental impact of wild capture fishing is often debated but the conditions for humans aboard those fishing boats seldom attract much interest. It is clear, however, that fishermen and independent observers are dying in the Pacific Ocean, the centre of the last great tuna gold rush.

In 2016, Pew Charitable Trusts reckoned worldwide global tuna trade was worth at least US$42.2 billion. The western and central Pacific produced $22.86 billion of that.

Standing between order and high seas anarchy are independent observers who earn between US$30 and US$200 a day, depending on where they are working. Pacific Island observers are at the lower end of the scale. Governments and regional organisations post them onto some of the 4,600 fishing boats that operate in the Western and Central Pacific – the lucrative source of tuna.

Fishing on the scale now underway in the Pacific first began in the 1980s when Japanese scientists recognised the extent of the tuna resource. Until a ban on drift-netting in 1989, deep-sea fishing relied on relatively small numbers of American, Taiwanese and Japanese ships. Over the last two decades, there has been a huge rise in mainly Chinese and Taiwanese longliners that have, in turn, required hundreds of low-cost crews.

The Pacific tuna race: Global Fishing Watch tracks every boat – this is fishing in the Pacific in the first six months of 2017. Each white dot represents multiple fishing boats. Photo: Global Fishing Watch

The 17-nation Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), based in the Solomon Islands, monitors the work of the observers who spend months at sea. The observers measure how much fish is caught, the type and methods used. They ensure fishing boats comply with a vast array of rules set by international organisations—such as not to take certain whale species—and various regional and national rules—such as how much of a particular species of tuna can be taken. There are also rules set by consumer advocacy groups that need to be monitored—such as prohibiting the catching of dolphins. In some areas observers also have to watch and report seabird catches.

“Observers are not police and have no power to enforce the rules,” the agency says in its explanatory guide.

There are 609 licensed ships, known as purse seiners, that carry observers. This is in part because they are bigger and usually more comfortable than the thousands of trawlers and boats hauling fishing lines. With onboard helicopters, seiners find large schools of tuna, and with an array of small boats, encircle them with large purse-like nets. Because they catch so much fish, it needs to be processed in a factory deck onboard.

The observers not only watch for infringements of various international and local rules for the waters they are in, but also take scientific data on fish size and health. Rules set by the 26-nation Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) require that five percent of the 3,105 longliner tuna boats must have observers. Actual coverage is around three percent, because the working and living conditions make it hard to find observers who are willing to sail on them.

The deaths of these observers has won little media coverage despite their colleagues fighting to keep the issue in focus.

The tough life of a tuna fisherman –  a photo from Usaia Masibalavu’s Facebook.

At the end of last year WCPFC met in Fiji. It is charged with fisheries control on the high seas. For its Fiji gathering, the World Wide Fund for Nature’s Pacific fisheries programme manager, Bubba Cook, created a “roll-of-honour” which he says he uses as “often as possible” to show the human cost of the work.

“I hate the fact that they are depersonalised as ‘observer’ as if they are just a piece of equipment,” Cook says.

The roll of observers is featured on the U.S.-based Association of Professional Observers (APO) website. But despite the association’s best efforts, the roll-call offers almost no information about the men, other than a name. It is also sparse on detail around the circumstances how each observer was lost at sea.

Charlie Lasisi, Wesley Talia and Larry Gavin from Papua New Guinea (PNG), are on the list, as is Usaia Masibalavu of Fiji and American Keith Davis.

Lasisi, 26, an observer with PNG’s National Fisheries Authority, was posted onto Dolores 838, a 28-year-old Philippines purse seiner.

The ship was fishing in the Bismarck Sea near the PNG/Indonesia border as part of its job in supplying Filipino-owned RD Tuna Canners Ltd in Madang, PNG. According to an independent PNG anti-corruption news website PNGExposedBlogLasisi complained that the ship was setting nets while dolphins were with the target fish – raising the potential of accidental catches.

PNG Police found that on March 29, 2010, Lasisi had disappeared. In PNG, some reports (also on PNGExposedBlog) said his body was found, Bubba Cook said in an interview with WikiTribune. But the official line, according to local media reports, including in The National, is that he was never discovered. Six Filipino crew were charged with Lasisi’s murder. According to PNG ExposedBlog, police had not acquired enough evidence to go to trial. Soon after the accused reached the PNG capital Port Moresby, they were freed and the case was dropped.

The Association of Professional Observers published an interview with Lasisi’s father in 2013.

“We don’t know why they killed him,” Lasisi’s father said. “The people that killed my son, their passports were taken from them in Port Moresby. Are they still in the county or have left, I wonder … if my son was killed on the boat, what is their punishment?”

Bubba Cook raised the issue at a WCPFC meeting in September 2015. He says the Philippines delegation head said he would do his own investigation. When he returned to the next meeting he announced he still did not know what happened.

Cook believes the Philippines delegate was distressed by what he had found out: “The best I can say is that the assumption was that Charlie was murdered and I am not afraid to say that all the evidence that I have seen points that way.”

This is backed up by a 2015 report by Dr Patricia Kailola, acting chief executive of Pacific Dialogue, a non-government organization, which addresses good governance, the rule of law, and human rights.

She states in her discussion paper delivered at the Pacific Tuna Forum: “A Papua New Guinea fisheries observer, Charles Lasisi, was murdered several years ago: his remains were recovered west of Wewak (north-western PNG); his legs/body were bound with chains.”

Body seen floating

Fisheries observer Wesley Talia disappeared off New Ireland in PNG in 2015. The APO says he was working with a fleet of up to nine foreign boats that had been given provincial, rather than national government, fishing permission. The APO was told Talia’s body was sighted by people in a canoe three days after he went missing. They wanted to tow it ashore, but their canoe was too full. He was gone, nothing more is known.

Larry Gavin was a PNG observer until 2016 but was lost at sea. To the APO’s anger, no details – such as the boat he was on, the circumstances of his disappearance or even where he came from in PNG, have been released by authorities there. No investigation was carried out, says APO president Elizabeth Mitchell, who adds that PNG was silent on Gavin while using his name to honour observer service.

“To me it’s truly nauseating,” Mitchell says.

Observer Usaia Masibalavu, of Fiji, had a busy Facebook page featuring photos from his observing days. On May 21, 2016, he died on board the U.S. registered seiner Western Pacific, owned by a Las Vegas, Nevada registered company. Mitchell says Masibalavu died from an injury to his knee that resulted in a lethal infection.

The company, Western Pacific Ltd, did not respond to requests for comment.

Fiji born observer Usaia Masibalavu died on an American purse seiner. Photo: Facebook

“It’s all very mysterious and I feel that it’s shameful that the U.S. government doesn’t publicly rule out negligence on the part of the vessel, or explain the circumstances and facts surrounding Usaia’s death,” Mitchell said in an email to WikiTribune.

A U.S. official had told the APO, Mitchell says, that Masibalavu was to have been placed on a ship that he had previously cited for illegal fishing for shark fins. Rather than putting him on that ship he was moved to another — the Western Pacific.

Mitchell says the official told her that the crew were broken up by his death, but, she says:  “I’ve seen the crocodile tears before. It doesn’t take away negligence.”

No public action has been taken by Fiji authorities. Masibalavu‘s death did not rate a mention in local media.

This was not the case when American Keith Davis vanished from the fishing boat he was on board to observe. His loss featured extensively in Hakai magazine (part of the Tula Foundation, an independent Canadian charitable foundation) this year. His story also features in this recent report from Human Rights at Sea.

Lost American observer Keith Davis. Photo: Facebook

In September 2015, Davis was aboard a Panama-flagged fish carrier, Victoria 168. One of the fleet of vessels trans-shipping catches at sea, it was 850 kilometres west of Peru in waters controlled by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, the eastern Pacific’s version of WCPFC.

Davis had been checking fish coming aboard from the Chung Kuo 818, a 110 ton longliner. Food and Agriculture Organisation data showed the Chung Kuo 818 was sailing under the Vanuatu flag. It has also flown Panama and Fiji flags. Its owner was listed as a Vanuatu shell company entity owned by Taiwan’s Gilontas Ocean, one of the Pacific’s biggest fishing fleet owners.

According to Hakai, Davis’ employer, MRAG Americas, contacted the U.S. Coast Guard about the disappearance. However, under maritime law, the ultimate responsibility to investigate lay with the Panama government. An investigation was undertaken but Davis’ fate remains a mystery.

The U.S National Marine Fisheries Service is silent and Mitchell says, because the case is still open, it allowed the U.S to sit on information indefinitely. Nobody has been charged. A little over a year before Davis disappeared, he emailed friends a video that showed four men being shot to death in the water while they clung to debris.

“One way or another, the video depicts murder,” Davis wrote, according to Hakai magazine.

Cook, who was a friend of Davis, says the blanks in all the stories are a major problem.

“It seems that the government authorities are prone to try and sweep these instances under the rug at every opportunity.”

Cook says the death of Davis received attention because he was American; the fates of the others remain unknown.

Key fishing nations opposed new protections

Davis’ disappearance persuaded the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Science and Technology (NMFS) to push WCPFC for tougher observer rules. NMFS showed  this PowerPoint presentation (PDF) to a December 2016 meeting in Fiji. It had a timeline on it that included the words the “loss of Masibalavu stressed inclusion of international treaty impact.” There was no further explanation of what it meant, but showed that his death at least involved issues that should have prompted further investigation.

To date nothing further has happened around Masibalavu’s loss, and nor has NMFS explained what international treaties would have made a difference. After a long fight, which one campaigning Pacific website reported ended with a victory haka or war dance, WCPFC adopted new “Observer Safety Measures” setting out specific actions to be followed if an observer got sick, injured, died or was lost overboard.

Japan, China, Taiwan and South Korea opposed the measures.

Six months later, PNG observer James Numbaru disappeared east of Nauru. He was aboard a Chinese flagged purse seiner, Feng Xiang 818, which had started life in 2003 under Taiwan’s flag, then Vanuatu, before becoming Chinese.

Lost off Nauru – PNG observer James Numbaru. Photo: Facebook

On June 28 this year, Numbaru fell overboard. Eleven days later, his wife Anne Emma Sombo posted a message on the APO’s Facebook page: “Is there anyone on this page from Nauru pls (sic) can you assist me for finding my missing husband,” she wrote. “(Am) asking for help coz I believe in my heart my husband is still alive and I know he drifted and some local fisherman around that area picked him up and his with them I can feel it pls help me stretch my search coz my God has saved my husband.”

Various authorities, including PNG police quoted by the daily PNG Post Courier newspaper, agreed that on-board cameras had filmed Numbaru removing his clothes, being disoriented, falling over repeatedly, appearing drunk and then falling overboard. Independent fisheries officials, with no reason to lie, are certain alcohol was the main factor.

Mitchell questions whether the alcohol line was introduced by Nauru police to cover the fact that the loss had come just after the change of rules.

Mitchell says the observer safety rules were not being followed on Feng Xiang 818.

Under the new safety rules, as soon as deck officers knew Numbaru went overboard the ship needed to stop fishing and begin a search and rescue. Feng Xiang 818 did not.

Global Fishing Watch is a nonprofit that analyzes remotely sensed data from ships at sea to identify fishing vessels and indicates where and when fishing occurs. It was founded by a partnership between international conservation group Oceana, SkyTruth and Google and receives funding from the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation.

Global Fishing Watch data, given to WikiTribune, shows that, at the time Numbaru went overboard, the ship was fishing, and continued to do so for four hours. The tracking shows no sign of any search and rescue activity over the following 72 hours. None of Numbaru’s clothing was preserved and the Feng Xiang 818 crew were not interviewed by police.

The voyage of purse seiner Feng Xiang 818 in during which observer James Numbaru disappeared east of Nauru (shown in white). Image: Global Fishing Watch

WWF’s Bubba Cook questions why the unedited video has never been released, not even to the family. He says if alcohol was involved, who offered it, and why were their no consequences for the captain for offering alcohol on a working ship.

Mitchell says she is troubled at the “possibility of justice slipping away.”

“It will take an exceptional effort to bring it to the international fora, such as the ILO and to pressure states into meting out justice,” she says.

Back to Tunago 61 off Pitcairn

After Xie Dingrong’s blood-drained body was put in with the frozen tuna, Tunago 61 returned to fishing east of Pitcairn. A day later, engineer Zhang Dapeng reported the death to the ship’s owners in Taiwan. He was ordered to sail the 6,600 kilometres to Fiji’s capital, Suva. They arrived on September 23, 2016. At the morgue, a post mortem itemized his wounds, including a “deep incised wound” in his neck which cut through his carotid artery. Cause of death was self-evident.

The Tunago 61’s voyage from April 2016 to September 2016. Photo: Global Fishing Watch

As Tunago 61 arrived in Suva, it became ensnared in the blurred world between the high seas and national sovereignty. The legal criminal processes concerning a body aboard a docking ship are complex. The crime was committed outside Fiji, thus not against its law. But China required an explanation for what happened to its national, and that was the responsibility of the country in which the ship was registered. Tunago 61 was part of the world of “flags of convenience” (FOC) countries where ship owners can cheaply register their vessels and avoid many of the safety and labour rules enforced in more rigorous countries.

Vanuatu is often used as such a country. It also offers a tax haven operation and by combining both services, the true ownership of ships becomes largely impenetrable.

Six Vanuatu ships are named “Tunago”, owned by the Tunago Fishery Co Ltd, which has its registered office at a Port Vila post office box that is the registered address of the European Trust Company – a shell company creator.

The company did not respond to requests for comment over allegations of mistreatment of the crew.

There are 72 licensed fishing vessels, most of them longliners, registered in Vanuatu. All of them are Chinese or Taiwan –owned. Flagging them there circumvents WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission) limits set in their own country.

“Migrant workers in particular are vulnerable to being….forced to work on board vessels under the threat of force or by means of debt bondage” – ILO

The International Labour Organization says forced labour and human trafficking in the fisheries sector is a severe problem with fishermen being vulnerable to human rights abuse aboard ships.

“Migrant workers in particular are vulnerable to being deceived and coerced by brokers and recruitment agencies and forced to work on board vessels under the threat of force or by means of debt bondage.”

It says victims faced illness, injury, psychological and sexual abuse, deaths of crewmates, and their vulnerability on board vessels in remote locations of the sea for months and years at a time.

“Fishers are forced to work for long hours at very low pay, and the work is intense, hazardous and difficult. Capture fisheries have one of the highest occupational fatality rates in the world.”

Fishers fall through gaps in laws and regulations set up to protect workers.

“As vessels are often at sea for long periods, the monitoring of the working conditions of fishers and the enforcement of legislation can be challenging.”

Indonesian fishermen are among the worst affected, with 7,919 of them on Taiwanese boats, 4,000 on Japanese, 1,666 on Malaysian and 2,043 on Korean fishing vessels.

‘Fishers have reportedly been murdered and their bodies disposed of at sea’ – ILO

The ILO says such migrant fishers were more likely to experience violence at work: “Some captains use violence to intimidate and foster compliance among migrant fishers and prevent them from trying to escape the vessel. In extreme cases, fishers have reportedly been murdered and their bodies disposed of at sea.”

In many cases of murder, the bodies are disposed of at sea and recorded as disappearances, due to the lack of adequate crew lists. Fishers may also be washed off the deck due to harsh weather conditions, or commit suicide because of mistreatment and abuse.

“Violence may also occur against the captain as a response to mistreatment,” the ILO says.

Suspects arrested and sent to Vanuatu

When Tunago 61 arrived in Suva, Fiji Police, notorious for their subservience to the country’s military and ineptitude in dealing with major crime, went aboard. Without lawyers or diplomats present, Indonesian crewmen Saepul Manap, Andi Riyadi, Riva Prangga Kliswanrio, Abdul Hasan Sidik, Suheri Meivan and Ade Marwadi allegedly admitted that they had killed the captain.

Illustration only. None of these boats are mentioned in this story. Foreign fishing boats are tied together at the main wharf in Fiji’s capital city Suva December 9, 2006. REUTERS/Tim Wimborne

They were arrested and, without any extradition hearing, were then sent to Vanuatu, a country they had never seen.

The death was ruled to have occurred on the high seas and so the flag country had jurisdiction. The six were put in Port Vila’s rundown prison. (As it happens they shared it with 14 of Vanuatu’s members of parliament (a quarter of all its MPs) who had been convicted of corruption.)

On July 4, 2017, the men were told in the Bahasa Indonesia language by an unofficial translator that they were being charged with causing Xie’s death. They pleaded guilty.

Vanuatu court documents show that the six accused joined Tunago 61 in around March or April 2015 in Kaoshing, Taiwan. They were part of a human trade run by Jakarta-based agents who send around 16,000 men to Asian boats.

Those involved are promised good conditions and wages, around US$200 a month, plus food and accommodation. The agents take a heavy slice of the wage.

With a crew of 28 or 30 men, 498-ton Tunago No 61 was a tight squeeze. There was no observer.

‘Fishing boats can be like a jail, with crews locked and in hard labour’ – former crewman

One-time fishing boat crewman, observer and more recently scientist and consultant, Francisco Blaha, knows his way around longliners. He says living conditions onboard are appalling.

“Yet you get on board Pacific Islands-flagged longliners, and there is not even one Pacific Islander on board since the salary, working conditions and cramped space on board are not good. Fishing boats can be like a jail, with crews locked and in hard labour.”

Vessel owners said if more were paid to crew, fish would become more expensive. However Blaha says many of the boats are paid subsidies by their governments.

In the Xie case, the Tunago 61 headed to international waters east of New Zealand’s Kermadec Islands, between 20 and 30 degrees South. It had permission from WCPFC to tranship its catch to another ship while still at sea, rather than come into port. It met fish carriers, like the one Davis worked on.

Tunago 61’s crew set the longlines to catch albacore, yellowfin and bigeye tunas. Longliners are notorious for catching sharks (as this report on Science Direct shows) . The Tunago 61 would have likely taken shark fin too.

After five months, skipper Xie headed into the northern Pacific, perhaps hoping for an increasingly rare north Pacific bluefin.

As Vanuatu Supreme Court Judge Daniel Fatiaki would note in the trial, the Indonesians kept asking Xie for their pay.

Beatings were ‘sporadically and systematically every day’ – crew testimony

Xie laughed at them. Leaving crew unpaid or underpaid is frequently reported by media as being standard on Asian boats.

A history of abuse

Tunago 61 had a record of physical abuse and underpayment of crew. In 2006, six Chinese fishers jumped ship in Pago Pago, American Samoa. They hid in nearby mountains, then tried to get help from the ship’s agent. Police refused to see them, the International Transport Workers’ Federation said later.

They sought refuge at the Pago Pago Seafarers’ Centre, telling director Christopher Evans of the extreme physical abuses on Tunago 61. Beatings were administered “sporadically and systematically every day.”

The skipper told them he carried a gun and that they could easily be “written off” as having been swept overboard. One worker was beaten with an iron rod, sustained serious head injuries and, bleeding profusely, was locked up in the bow for three days without food or water.

Another fisher was chatting with a colleague when he was grabbed by the hair and repeatedly punched in the face. After the first assault by the chief engineer, the man was beaten with a thick wooden rod on his thigh, stomach and back.

For failing to secure bait firmly on all hooks before they were flung in the sea, a young fisher was attacked by the skipper who repeatedly punched him in the face again then kicked him in the head when he fell to the deck. The fisher’s punishment continued with another round of beatings, making him work continuously for almost 48 hours.

On Xie’s fatal voyage Tunago 61, with the six unpaid Indonesians aboard, returned to Taiwan. She sailed out again on May 7, 2016 with the captain, engineer and a crew of 26; six Vietnamese, seven Filipinos and 13 Indonesians – including the six later accused.

East of New Zealand, crewmember Riyadi would say things got worse, according to Fatiaki’s sentencing judgment in Vanuatu.

The crew were made to eat canned pork despite being Muslim, which prohibits its consumption. But it was the only food there was. Sometimes they were forced to eat fishing bait. They were made to work 22 hours a day and were not allowed to use the ship’s phone to contact family. They were still unpaid.

On September 7, 2016, Riyadi cut his hand cleaning catch. He went to the captain to ask for medication, but says the captain scoffed at him. When Riyadi asked a second time, Xie slapped him on the face. The other Indonesians joined Riyadi and went back to the captain. They told him that if he did not help them, they would kill him. Xie laughed at him and replied that he did not care if Riyadi lived or died, according to the evidence presented in the Vanuatu court.

‘The ferocity and frenzied nature of the attack is evidenced by the location, nation and number of injuries that were inflicted on the deceased’s body’ – testimony

Crewmember Kliswanrio said the crew’s anger had grown over 16 months, leading to the lethal mutiny off Pitcairn.

Fatiaki described in his finding that the armed men went to the “defenceless captain” sleeping in his cabin and attacked him: “The attack was indiscriminate and sustained even when the victim called out and unsuccessfully tried to get away from his attackers and defend himself.

“The ferocity and frenzied nature of the attack is evidenced by the location, nation and number of injuries that were inflicted on the deceased’s body.”

After they had killed Xie, the crew realized matters were serious. But they decided not to dump his body, instead putting him in the freezer. They then continued fishing.

The vessel later sailed to Fiji where the six were arrested and sent to Vanuatu. Once in custody there, they were taken before court where they admitted what they had done. On August 11, 2017, the final legal act came when they appeared before Judge Fatiaki for sentencing.

A controversial figure in the Pacific, Fatiaki had been chief justice in Fiji but was forced out by the military after allegations over his behavior in two coups (PDF report from the International Bar Association).

“Fortunately for you, Vanuatu, unlike your own country, does not have the death penalty,” he told the six men before him.

The killing of Xie was “brutal, premeditated and merciless” and no Vanuatu court “ever had to deal with a case such as this of wanton uncontrolled, violence with such a disdain for human life.”

Fatiaki accepted the six crew members had had a hard time at sea and lamented that Fiji police had not investigated their treatment. Provocation was not a defence, he said, as anger and hatred did not excuse the taking of life.

‘Human life is worth less than the fish they pursue’ – WFF fisheries expert

Prosecutor Tristan Karae wanted life imprisonment but Fatiaki began the kind of bidding process common in courts, setting a starting point of 30 years. He deducted two years for the men’s remorse and crime-free records. For pleading guilty, they got nine years carved off their sentence. Fatiaki deducted one further year for the duress each man suffered on the vessel. The six crew members were sentenced to 18 years in prison, with the possibility of parole in nine years.

Karae demanded that the men’s money be paid to the captain’s family. Fatiaki said that was impossible, as there was no money.

The case garnered just two stories in the local media, the Vanuatu Daily Post.

No appeals were lodged and the six, still unpaid, are in jail. Their court-appointed lawyer did not respond to an interview request for this story.

World Wide Fund for Nature’s Bubba Cook says that when crews are starved by their captains, killing observers was a distinct possibility. He is cynical about ever getting justice: “Because for some of the people involved, human life is worth less than the fish they pursue.”

For illustrative purposes only: A man walks among yellowfin tuna at the fishing port of Donggang, southern Taiwan May 19, 2010. REUTERS/Pichi Chuang

 

Be the change. Support WikiTribune's mission to fix the news - Jimmy Wales

Support us

Talk (20)

Robert Joyce

"I agree with Peter Bale here that new..."

Joel Gallant

"I think rewording that particular sen..."

Peter Bale

"Interesting. Thanks. The point of ref..."

kris seelbach

"Yair Rand post I agree with. The tone..."

Sources & References

Glossary

Association of Professional Observers (APO)

A non-profit, non-governmental organisation with a mission to strengthen observer programmes on fishing boats around the world.

Drift netting

Letting fishing nets attached to buoys drift to catch fish is an old technique made radically dangerous to the environment when the Japanese developed nylon monofilament. Some tuna nets ended up being 55 kilometres long and attracted the name “wall of death” fishing. New Zealand efforts in 1989 resulted in the Convention for the Prohibition of Fishing with Long Driftnets in the South Pacific. Wall of death fishing is used by illegal fishers still.

Exclusive economic zone (EEZ)

Established under the United Nations Law of the Sea, coastal states have jurisdiction over the exploration and exploitation of the sea 200 nautical miles (370 kilometres) out from the coastline.

Flags of convenience

Many ship owners – not just fishing vessels – register their ships in countries that have less regulation and lower costs and taxes. Ships operate under the law of the flag of the country. The advantage for the flag state is that registration offers a source of income to them. The major FOC states are Liberia, Panama and the Marshall Islands.

Forum Fisheries Agency

Founded in 1979 and based in the Solomon Islands, the 17-nation FFA monitors and in part regulates activities inside the EEZs of its members.

Global Fishing Watch (GFW)

With significant funding support from the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, GFW has added a powerful new tool for individuals and environmental groups keen to monitor what happens in the world’s fisheries. It uses data technologies to show were all trackable commercial fishing activity has happened since 2012. They track the Automatic Identification Signals from ships at sea and have used artificial intelligence tools to distinguish individual vessel tracks and identify when vessels are fishing, based on their movements.

High seas

The open ocean, not part of an exclusive economic zone, territorial waters or internal waters of any state.

Long line fishing

As the name implies, this fishing technique uses hooks and lines rather than nets. Lines can be up to 100 kilometres long and each can have up to 3000 hooks. A longliner finds a school of fish and using boat speed hauls a line through it. Careful skippers will avoid also killing sharks, billfish such as marlin and swordfish, sea turtles and seabirds.

Observers

Men and women working for government and independent agencies reporting on tuna fishing catches and methods. Often they travel with the fishing vessels, being away at sea for weeks or months at a time, to gather independent information about what is happening on fishing vessels at sea.

Purse seining

An almost ancient form of fishing, purse seining today involves a large wall of netting deployed around an entire school of fish. The seine has floats along the tip and is pulled around the school by small high speed boats attached to the main vessel. A variety of techniques are used to find schools, including on board helicopters. Occasionally pilots will drop small fish bombs in the water to herd the school so that the nets can catch them. More controversially – and now banned in some areas at some time – are floating aggregation devices (FADs). Tuna, in particular, will gather under anything floating in the open ocean and FADs can be left on the water to attract them. Some are even moored and have electronic equipment to monitor how many fish have arrived. The major problem with FADs is the by-catch of dolphins and sharks.

An explanation of purse seine fishing by Trimarine Group, one of the world’s biggest tuna fishing companies.

Tuna

Pacific fishing focuses mainly on tuna and the species of skipjack and albacore with the latter usually found in cans. Pacific fisheries are also hitting stressed and even endangered tunas such as bigeye and Pacific bluefin.

Western and Central Pacific Fishing Commission

Established in 2004 by convention, WCPFC tries to manage high seas fisheries. It aims to end unregulated fishing, excessive fleets, vessel re-flagging and to create international cooperation in the area. Its members are Australia, China, Canada, Cook Islands, European Union, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, Kiribati, South Korea,  Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Taiwan, Tonga, Tuvalu, USA and Vanuatu. Non-independent states are also members, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, French Polynesia, Guam, New Caledonia, Tokelau and Wallis and Futuna. Non-members who have agreed to cooperate are Ecuador, El Salvador, Mexico, Panama, Liberia, Thailand and Vietnam.

 


Author

Journalist Michael Field has been writing about the Pacific for three decades. More recently, his investigations have led him into a dark world of foreign-flagged vessels fishing the waters of New Zealand, other Pacific nations, and the Southern Ocean. He has uncovered brutality, misery and death – as well as impending ecological disaster: the destruction of the last great southern schools of fish.

History for Story "Big read: Murder and abuse – the price of your sashimi"

  1. Charles Anderson update as per revisions in Talk
  2. Charles Anderson amended GFW description
  3. Peter Bale Adding big read
  4. Peter Bale
  5. Phil Collins Updated source of image in the glossary
  6. Phil Collins Moved source of images from old beta URL
  7. Charles Anderson standfirst change
  8. Tobin Stokes correction of description of Tula Foundation
  9. Thomas Eagle a typo and a few suggested rephrasings
  10. Peter Bale Shortened headline
  11. Peter Bale Published
  12. Charles Anderson tweak
  13. Charles Anderson add human rights at sea report
  14. Burhan Wazir editing
  15. Peter Bale Highlights, gentle revisions
  16. Peter Bale Near-to-final edit PGB
  17. Charles Anderson links
  18. Charles Anderson imagery
  19. Charles Anderson imagery
  20. Charles Anderson update
  21. Charles Anderson tweak
  22. Charles Anderson add
  23. Charles Anderson tweak
  24. Charles Anderson tweak
  25. Charles Anderson tweak
  26. Charles Anderson tweak
  27. Charles Anderson update
  28. Charles Anderson pics
  29. Charles Anderson tweak
  30. Charles Anderson photos
  31. Charles Anderson fortmatting
  32. Charles Anderson headline tweak
  33. Charles Anderson update
  34. Charles Anderson standfirst
  35. Charles Anderson standfirst
  36. Michael Field Removed the double paragraph spaces
  37. Michael Field Loading the agreed draft of the fishing story

Big read: Murder and abuse – the price of your sashimi

Talk about this Story

  1. Flagged as bias

    Yair Rand post I agree with. The tone of this article does not maintain objective-style reporting. Also, the author is quoting his extensive research is off-putting.

    1. Rewrite

      Interesting. Thanks. The point of referring to his extensive research is to try to establish credibility or commitment over time to the story. What do you think a more “objective” approach would be? More from tuna boat owners?

      1. Rewrite

        I think rewording that particular sentence could change the sentiment. Something similar to “The research that I have conducted over the years…” makes it feel a little less off-putting in my opinion.

  2. Rewrite

    I would like to make a couple of corrections to this article: 1) Under the title “Disappeared”, APO didn’t conduct the interview with the family. This was provided to us from another journalist who was working there on the issue. 2) Also under “Disappeared”, there is a mention of observer salary. A couple observers mentioned to me that the figure of $30-40/day is not correct. I don’t think it’s too far off though for the Pacific Islands observer programs (FFA, NORMA, PNA). The salaries vary and observers are often getting cheated by their programs. For instance, I heard that FFA was supposed to pay observers $75/day with a debriefing score (post trip evaluation of data) of 95% or better. But at least one observer reported that despite a high score, this observer received only $45/day. Observers in the United States can make over $200/day.

  3. Other

    Thank you for covering this story. I know how difficult it is to find observers who will share information, especially with their name on record. Many reporters come to the APO wanting to talk with observers. Although we have almost a 1000 members on our Facebook group, very few will discuss details about what they witness at sea. They fear losing their jobs and I imagine, given the recent disappearances, some fear losing their lives. Observers are muzzled under strict confidentiality agreements with the agencies.

    The victory pride following the success of the passing of the WCPFC observer safety measures in 2016 was short-lived. Not even a year had passed before another Papua New Guinea (PNG) observer disappeared. National Fisheries Authority (NFA) claimed James Junior Numbaru didn’t have his 2-way communication device turned on when he boarded and the NFA didn’t bother to check why they were getting no signal from him. Someone, whose program or country stood to be embarrassed at the complete lack of their own follow-through to implement these measures, LIED to the press, claiming the vessel followed all the measures.

    It was only through Global Fishing Watch that we were able to determine that the vessel continued fishing. Two reviewers of the data and a third expert witness concluded that the vessel continued fishing. However, we lack the VMS data from NFA (or Nauru – I’m not sure who has this data) to compare with the GFW AIS data (Automatic Identification System) and conclude beyond a doubt that this is true. We should be demanding from the NFA to compare the two data sets and publish the results.

    The vessel operators also cut the film in 3 sections, deleting the remaining footage, saying they didn’t have enough computer space, which is laughable and another violation of the measures (to preserve all evidence). Nauru authorities would have known this at the time of their investigation before turning them loose. They let the other observer fly home to the Solomon Islands in less than 24 hours without any investigation (another violation). If it weren’t for the family conducting their own investigation, we wouldn’t have this information.

    James is seen on the CCTV footage arguing with someone up above on the upper deck (which is out of the view of the camera). Despite his disorientation and apparent intoxication, he is seen covering his genitals when he faces the wheelhouse, which indicates someone was up there and leads me to believe he was coerced and that there was, at the very least, a witness to him falling overboard. They also have a responsibility toward the safety of the observers and should never allowed the drinking to occur in the first place (if it was alcohol). The vessel operator claims all were asleep and they were drifting, yet the GFW data indicates they were moving. What authorities wanted was an easy story – observer got drunk, fell overboard in the middle of the night, blame it on the observer, end of story.

    Observers in this program advise each other to always keep their notebook in hand in order to keep the crew from accessing what they are recording. Just recently one observer caught a crewman thumbing through his notebook. Some programs advise observers not to record anything until they return. We should remain open to the possibility that James was drugged, especially in light of the footage being partially deleted. Three days before he disappeared, James recorded a notation in his notebook with a position and a simple reference to “pollution”.The CCTV footage shows James throwing down his notebook on the deck and then undressing. The PNG NFA are still “investigating” but we have heard no new news since August 2017. They’ve refused my requests for more information on Wesley Talia, Larry Gavin, and Charlie Lasisi.

    Very few observer programs report on observer interference, harassment and assault and, in fact, most information that observers report is kept from the public, including the violations they witness and even human trafficking. In the United States, only ONE observer program in the entire country reports on observer harassment and it’s very difficult to find information on the violations they report.

    In 2012, a Hawaii longline crew member died from bed bug pesticide poisoning, which prompted a massive cleanup at the dock to destroy dozens of infected mattresses and carpets from the fleet. Long-suffering Hawaii longline observers have been reporting these conditions for years (at least since 2006). They were also reporting on the potential human trafficking conditions for at least 10 years and some reports had enough credible evidence to justify the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to involve the Homeland Security Victim Assistance, prompting in 2015 the posting of signs at the docks in Honolulu that warn against human trafficking. Yet when the story broke in 2013 and again in 2016 about possible human trafficking in that fishery, the longline fishing industry leaders led a media propaganda campaign. They said they would implement a ‘rapid assessment of fleet’ to determine the perpetrators. They formed a ‘task force’ and drew up a mandatory ‘universal crew contract’. All of these efforts were bogus whitewash used by the industry to deflect accountability, while NMFS stood by in silence sitting on reports of multiple observer witnesses spanning over 10 years that could have quickly isolated the repeat offenders of human rights abuses.

    The public should be completely outraged that the management of these observer programs are mandating observer coverage, while ignoring observer welfare and keeping the information from the public. We should be demanding transparency of observer information and data and not just blindly accept the words “sustainable” or “certified”, just because a fishery has observer coverage. Likewise, we shouldn’t ask for more observer coverage without simultaneously demanding guarantees that the observer can do their job safely. Ask what they use to determine these certifications – none require the safety and welfare of observers or gauge the agency’s transparency and management.

    1. Rewrite

      Thanks. I’ll talk to the author. It’s an amazing story.

  4. Flagged as bias

    There’s a *lot* of non-neutral writing in this article.

    Some of the more serious problems, from the top:
    * Using a second-person pronoun in the title .
    * List of quotes, all on one side of a debate. The article is littered with quotes that are almost all advocacy, and all on one side.
    * “…suspicious circumstances”, “mysterious deaths”. Non-neutral writing style.
    * “appalling conditions”. This is a value judgement, not a statement of fact.
    * “fallen victim to”, “virtual slavery”, again.
    * “a murky world where borders are hard to define and justice hard to come by”, assertions of opinion.
    * “As 46-year-old skipper Xie Dingrong lay in his bunk he might have reflected on how tough it was to bring sashimi from the seas of the South Pacific to the world.” … Bizarre speculation, trying to promote a narrative using imagery to establish a certain ambiance.
    * “reckons”, please avoid synonyms for “state” in these contexts. “…is one of world’s most dangerous jobs.” Be specific.
    * “Xie’s wife back in Fuijan, China, would become a widow. Their 12-year-old child would start at middle-school without a father.” …I really hope the problems with this is obvious to all.
    * “Despite the curious irony…”, that’s a statement of opinion.
    * “Xie’s killers would face harsh justice”, “harsh” is an opinion. Either be specific, or leave it out. Idioms like “face justice” are non-neutral expressions.
    * “Standing between order and high seas anarchy”, non-neutral.
    * “The deaths of these observers has won little media coverage despite their colleagues fighting to keep the issue in focus.” “won”, “fighting”, non-neutral framing.
    * “The tough life of a tuna fisherman”, opinion.
    * “Independent fisheries officials, with no reason to lie…”, opinion.
    * “Vessel owners claimed…”, “claimed” is a non-neutral synonym of “said”/”stated”.
    * “skipper Xie headed into the northern Pacific, perhaps hoping for an increasingly rare north Pacific bluefin”, speculation.
    * “…But it was the only food there was.”
    * “They were still unpaid.” Use of “still” here is editorializing.
    * The final quote, “Because for some of the people involved, human life is worth less than the fish they pursue.”, is clearly not there just to describe the positions here.

    This article is presenting a narrative, and advocating a position. To be at all neutral, one must write about disputes, not engage in them. Writing neutrally is difficult, but “high quality, neutral journalism” is the whole point here, so it’s worth working on.

    1. Rewrite

      We are going to run a Q&A with the author of this piece. That may help.
      I can also be clear that the author has spent many years covering this issue. Neutral is not the same as being uninterested.
      The story makes very clear that the conditions on the ships are often poor for the workers and that they are often put in the position of not being paid for their work or paid on time.
      The conditions which amount to “modern slavery” are well documented in the sources and links as are the detailed investigations by the reporter and the sources he quotes.
      It is also clear in the story that we made extensive inquiries with the ship owners and representatives.
      I am not sure finding someone to say “it’s all fine and these people would be unemployed if they didn’t work in dangerous conditions on fishing boats” would make it more balanced.

    2. Rewrite

      I have changed “claimed” to “said”.
      I don’t believe the facts of this story are in dispute. You can also see we have made every effort to try to get the viewpoints of the fishing boat owners.
      It may well be advocating a position in the sense that the unexplained deaths of fishing observers, the poor working conditions of fishermen (“fishers”) and documented cases of murder, abusive behavior and over-fishing are things I think we can agree are worthy of scrutiny.
      It’s an interesting question how far a neutral point of view goes. “Slavery: good or bad, we canvas the views”. To be slightly facetious.
      Neutral is not the same as uninterested (not disinterested). We will not be politically biased but a piece of reportage about this subject is not going to be entirely without perspective nor without a small amount of licence to speculate in the sense of wondering what the feelings of a skipper about to be murdered might have been. It may not to be everyone’s taste but that is — to my mind — a matter of style rather than a text book or reference work.

      1. Rewrite

        So, my understanding of “neutrality” is quite heavily influenced by Wikimedia, which is rather, shall we say, “absolutist” on that issue. If someone were to write or imply that “slavery is bad” or anything similar on Wikipedia or Wikinews, that would be reverted immediately. You cannot make a value judgement on anything and still remain neutral. (Take a look at the Wikipedia article on slavery; can you tell whether the authors are pro- or anti-slavery? Would it look any different?)

        Neutral is not synonymous with uninterested, and one can present a neutral point of view and not be uninterested, but if one can tell from the writing that the author is not uninterested, it’s not neutral.

        I understand that Wikitribune is completely independent from and unrelated to Wikimedia, but given that Wikitribune was opened with Jimmy Wales’ “Neutrality is nonnegotiable” tagline (the same phrasing he’s been using for the past ~15 years on Wikimedia), and that he helped build many of the standards that led to Wikimedia’s current understanding of the concept of neutrality, I would have thought that Wikitribune would at least come somewhere close to those standards. If speculation, value judgements, and promotion of a particular viewpoint are all allowed, what does neutrality mean?

        1. Rewrite

          Interesting. We’re all learning the ropes.
          I don’t believe a “news” or investigation which brings to a larger audience the story which exposes people living in shocking (value judgment) conditions, probably classed as modern slavery (2nd value judgment), and involves the unexplained disappearance of multiple inspectors in “highly suspicious” (third value judgment) is going to be the same as an encyclopedia entry about the phenomenon of modern slavery (though it would be an excellent link if someone wanted to know what it’s all about).

          The very idea of authors being “pro slavery” makes me quite uncomfortable.

          We could, perhaps, have found someone to say: “I like tuna very much and I don’t want to pay more for it so now that you have told me that people die because of it and live in terrible conditions, I have to say that is an acceptable price to pay.”

          These are very interesting questions and will no doubt be discussed as we try to achieve an appropriate level of evidence-based neutrality without slipping in to the horror of moral equivalence and “whataboutism”.

      2. Rewrite

        I agree with Peter Bale here that news reporting is different than encyclopedic rhetoric. A narrative that is interesting, while bringing the pertinent facts to the surface will have language that is not neutral in the sense of personal point of view. However, this experiment – Wikitribune – is professing the attempt at producing the best, most accurate, and non-biased news on the planet. And therefore should be subjected to the most stringent of examinations. It seems to me that the story here is about the disappearance of and the ill treatment of people in the tuna fishing industry of the South Pacific.

        Saying things like “the plunder of the fishery” is a value judgement that exposes a political leaning towards the environmentalist view point. While I’m not saying that there is anything wrong with environmentalism, but it is a point of political bias. I think the article can be written without the environmentalist rhetoric and still be very interesting and informative.

        The news should alert people to things that are wrong with the state of the world so that the light of truth can be shown on them. But the news shouldn’t be the ones to say which side of an argument is the “Right” side.

  5. Other

    As a reader I found the reference to your own work in the first paragraph immediately up regulating my skeptic genes. I agree it is a great way to market a book.

    “based on reports and my own extensive research.”

    Mixing speculative statements with facts (e.g., court documents) simply compels me, the reader, to question the veracity of what I am reading.

    “As 46-year-old skipper Xie Dingrong lay in his bunk he might have reflected on how tough…”

    Do you have evidence that Xie was a reflective individual?

    “As Xie’s bleeding body was stacked in a freezer with tuna…”

    Was the body still bleeding when transported to the freezer?

    Is WikiTribune embracing a tabloid writing style?

    1. Other

      Jeffrey,

      I agree that this is a lot more of an editorial piece than a report piece. The thing that jumped out to me was the point of the authors extensive research; which the link leads me to a new interview.

      I would much rather read his extensive research in order to see where the facts are arising from vs learning that the author wrote a book and is promoting it via the radio interview.

      Unfortunately, I don’t feel that this is the right piece for WT and doesn’t quite fit.

    2. Rewrite

      Thanks. I know of few tabloids that would devote 5,000 or so words or the years of investigation that underly the work. Your point about reflecting is perfectly valid of course.

      1. Rewrite

        I present my observations from the perspective of an “educated” (citation needed) reader with an interest in general news that approximates a NPOV (e.g., Geopolitical Futures in the area of geopolitics); my presumption is that you approach the essay from the perspective of journalist-editor.

        I restate my argument: Mixing speculative statements with facts (e.g., court documents) simply compels me, the reader, to question the veracity of what I am reading.

    3. Rewrite

      Here is the description from the post-mortem which suggests the body was highly likely to be bleeding when it was put in the freezer.
      +A post mortem report, presented to the Vanuatu Supreme Court nearly a year later, showed the dead skipper’s body had 41 wounds to his head, neck and body, causing massive hemorrhaging.+

      1. Rewrite

        The post-mortem report does not “suggest” anything, it is a report of what was observed at the time of the autopsy (post-mortem examination).

        1. Rewrite

          The big question that I would have is how long between the stabbings and the move to the freezer? Was it done right away – than yes, he could have still be bleeding out; however, if he was only moved 20mins later, there’s a good chance that the Captain had already bled out. The post mortem presented or quoted did not specify that piece of information.

    4. Rewrite

      To be clear, if it helps, the writer has spent literally years on this subject and is one of the few voices to continually report it at substantial personal cost. I doubt the promotion of the book is the issue so much as establishing evidence of commitment.

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Open menu Close menu Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later