Media |Report

Who are fact checkers and what do they do?

This story is part of a series on fact checking by WikiTribune reporter Harry Ridgewell: others are on the rise of fact checking in response to the “fake news” debate, an interview with The New Yorker’s legendary fact checker, plus how to spot fake images and news. Please add to or TALK about them.

A recent boom in fact checking is trying to tackle the rapid rise of mass misinformation, widespread inaccuracy and “fake news.” Fact checkers aim to establish whether claims made by politicians and media outlets are accurate and well-founded, and then correct them when they are wrong, before they can have dangerous or damaging consequences. (Check out our Big Read: How fact checking evolved in the internet era here.

WikiTribune spoke to Africa Check, Full Fact and The Conversation – three leading organizations that specialize in fact checking. Africa Check launched in 2012 and is the first website (VOA News) in South Africa to focus solely on fact checking. Full Fact is a UK-based fact checker and charity also working on two projects designed to automate the fact-checking process. The Conversation is a not-for-profit current affairs website, which works with academics to produce fact checks.

We interviewed Kate Wilkinson, senior researcher at Africa Check, Phoebe Arnold, head of communications and impact at Full Fact, and Lucinda Beaman, fact check editor at The Conversation, about fake news, trust and their tips for readers. All three were interviewed in late 2017. The following has been lightly edited for clarity.

Why is fact checking important?

Wilkinson (Africa Check): Because newsrooms have gotten smaller. Because of cutbacks and growth, there aren’t as many people in a newsroom as there used to be, and a lot of those people are younger than they used to be, and there’s a 24-hour news cycle with all these deadlines. There often isn’t much time for important fact checking to be done which holds people accountable. We see time and time again where newsrooms will publish what politicians have said as though their word is golden and what they’re saying is true. But when you actually take the time – which we’re lucky enough to have – to check if it’s true and see if they have evidence, often you find that they don’t, and that this misinformation is just accepted as fact because someone with a public status said it.

Arnold (Full Fact): It’s about making it easy for people to have the same access to information as politicians who’ve got the Civil Service at their disposal … I suppose it’s about holding people to account for what they say … the fact that we call people up does have an effect. We call it the “they know we check” effect, so there’s been a few times over the last years where people say, “Oh god, not you again.”

Beaman (The Conversation): Because we need to make sure that our politicians and readers and other influential people in society are held to account and aware that it’s not acceptable to spin information to such an extent that it becomes very misleading or to share false information.

Screenshot - Africa Check homepage (CC 0)
Screenshot – Africa Check homepage (CC 0)

How do you think we can tackle fake news?

Wilkinson: I think the easiest and best thing we need to do to combat fake news is that we all have to stop doing what we’re all really guilty of – and that’s sometimes sharing it. The public really is the engine of fake news because they’re the ones who drive it on social media and share it and drive the viral traffic to it. We need to be more responsible internet users. And we need to make sure that what we share is true and that we’re not helping line someone’s pockets because they’re writing false stories and posting them as news. (Read How to spot fact from online fiction here.)

Beaman: I think technology is going to be extremely important in battling fake news in terms of identifying the sources of fake news and catching it as it’s spreading. Once information is out there, you can’t completely call it back. Even if you can correct it, the seed of doubt has already been planted, and obviously not everyone will see the correction or believe it. So there are going to need to be some very impressive technological advances to be able to very quickly identify fake news as it’s spreading. We need to find ways to deal with people who are propagating it. It’s gonna be extremely tough.

Screenshot - Full Fact homepage (CC 0)
Screenshot – Full Fact homepage (CC 0)

Why were you founded?

Wilkinson: Our director was an AFP correspondent in Nigeria and he saw in the 1990s how polio had really made a comeback in the country. And one of the main driving forces behind this was misinformation … spread by imams in cultural communities, about the fact that the polio vaccine was actually being used to sterilize Nigerian women. And this led to people not vaccinating their children because of fear and because of this misinformation. Africa Check is really a way to first counter misinformation [and] provide accurate information to people making political or economic or health decisions about their lives.

Arnold: Peter Oborne, who used to work for British newspaper The Telegraph, wrote a book called The Rise of Political Lying about the UK, which our director read …. and he thought, maybe we need fact checkers here, like Oborne says. That’s how it got set up, and he sent a proposal to several different peers of different [political] parties, saying, “I’d like to do this. Would you be interested? Do you think it’s a good idea?” And within 24 hours, they all replied saying they thought it was a really necessary and good idea and then from there we went on.

Beaman: [We are] bridging that gap between the public and academia … this is what The Conversation is about. So we’re bringing all that expertise and research and we’re finding a way to get it to everyone in society so they can benefit from all of that knowledge accumulated in our universities. And that’s what I mean … our tagline is: “Academic rigor, journalistic flair.

Screenshot - The Conversation Fact Check homepage (CC 0)
Screenshot – The Conversation Fact Check homepage (CC 0)

Why should we trust you?

Wilkinson: We make sure that we’re completely transparent in our process. We hyperlink to all the information we use, and we’re always open to discussing and engaging with people on our reasoning, on our conclusions, so that they can understand how we’ve reached it.

Arnold: We prefer if people don’t just trust us outright. One of the reasons we were set up is Onora O’Neill – she’s a peer in the House of Lords and also a professor of philosophy – did some really great lectures in 2002, for the BBC’s Reith Lectures and in it she said, “We don’t want to place blind trust as children do, but informed trust.”

Beaman: We don’t accept any advertising. We require our academic authors to publish disclosure statements alongside their articles, so that readers can see any funding that they receive, where it came from, and any other affiliations they might have. We also ask all our academic authors to provide links to research and data, and other evidence to support the statements they make in their articles. We aren’t asking our readers to trust us, so much as giving them all the information possible so that they can interrogate information and make a decision for themselves.

What tips do you have for users?

Wilkinson: The best and easiest thing you can do before you believe something or click the share button is ask the researcher’s questions: Is it true? Could it be true?

Beaman: Perhaps consume less information, but what you do consume, consume it critically, so really think about the information, assess it. Take a minute to click on a link, if there is a link, to a source and ask yourself: “Is it a credible source? Is it a government data set? Is it a data set that has existed for a long time from a reputable organization? Is it a research report that’s published in a peer reviewed journal?” Take the time to look into it, especially before sharing the information with others. 

This story is part of a series on fact checking by WikiTribune reporter Harry Ridgewell: others are on the rise of fact checking in response to the “fake news” debate, an interview with The New Yorker’s legendary fact checker, plus how to spot fake images and news. Please add to or TALK about them.


Started by

United Kingdom
Harry is one of the journalists at WikiTribune. He is a masters graduand from Cardiff University, with a diploma in Magazine Journalism. He has an interest in politics and science, having previously studied Geography at Aberystwyth University. Follow Harry on Twitter @harryridgewell

History for stories "Who are fact checkers and what do they do?"

Select two items to compare revisions

01 December 2017

15:36:36, 01 Dec 2017 . .‎ Peter Bale (Updated → Adding promotion of other stories in series)

30 November 2017

15:39:31, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Linh Nguyen (Updated → removed full stop in summary)
15:34:34, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → Added extra images)
15:23:58, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → minor edit)
14:42:19, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → Fixed typo)
14:23:32, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )
14:21:19, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )
14:15:11, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → Altered intro & trimmed)
12:06:09, 30 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → added more)

29 November 2017

16:49:08, 29 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )
16:45:24, 29 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )
14:45:08, 29 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )
10:59:32, 29 Nov 2017 . .‎ Ed Upright (Updated → )

28 November 2017

17:11:52, 28 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → making it so edits require approval)

01 November 2017

14:04:43, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → )
12:35:04, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → last save pre lunch)
12:33:39, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → reith link)
12:19:07, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → IFCN link)
12:14:52, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → improved)
11:41:45, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → improved)
11:34:48, 01 Nov 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → improved)

31 October 2017

09:47:45, 31 Oct 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → OBORNE link)
09:41:38, 31 Oct 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → updating)
09:27:51, 31 Oct 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → update summary/link to Oborne book)
09:21:47, 31 Oct 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → explaining The Conversation, smoothing start)

30 October 2017

15:26:33, 30 Oct 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → fixing Oborne/new head)
11:49:00, 30 Oct 2017 . .‎ Harry Ridgewell (Updated → removing words for now)

Talk for Story "Who are fact checkers and what do they do?"

Talk about this Story

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later