Spain |Explainer

Who will stand for Catalan independence in the December elections?

Talk (7)

LF

Leia Fee

"We all know dictionary definitions do..."
Angela Long

Angela Long

"Hi Leia, According to the Oxford D..."
FC

Fernando Cueva

"“ In 2015, the pro-independence par..."
LF

Leia Fee

"Is "Separatist" generally considered..."

Catalan separatists and their struggle for independence have played large in international news since October 1, when the Spanish courts sent armed police forces to crack down on what they deemed an illegal referendum on independence. Images of policemen beating Catalan citizens garnered international attention for a social and political conflict that had been mounting over previous years. However, this conflict is embedded in a much larger historical struggle for Catalan national aspirations which has been ongoing for centuries. Here we examine some of the key players in the independence campaign.

After deposing the entire Catalan autonomous government, Mariano Rajoy, Spain’s prime minister, called new elections for the Catalan parliament on December 21 this year.

What can we expect from these elections? This is indeed a complex question, for Catalonia is now immersed in a social crisis that has fractured a great part of its society, and peaceful cohabitation. To begin with, the pro-independence parties will not stand as a unified front in the elections, as they did in 2015. During that year, the two main pro-independence parties, Partit Demòcrata Europeu Català (which used to be Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya) and Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya formed an electoral coalition (which also included members of the pro-independence civil society platforms Assamblea Nacional Catalana and Omnium Cultural) called Junts pel Si. This presented itself as a united front for independence. Those elections in 2015 were portrayed by this political alliance as plebiscitary elections, and understood as a political mandate towards the declaration of independence. In 2015, the pro-independence parties (Junts pel Si and la CUP) achieved 48% of the vote, but due to the Catalan electoral system, they gained an absolute majority in the Catalan autonomous parliament. This allowed them to call for the referendum on October 1 2017, and subsequently declare unilateral independence.

The fact that the main pro-independence parties will not stand together in these future elections has fostered a new political scenario among those parties that argue Catalonia’s right to independence. Among them, Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (ERC), a historical nationalist party which has always defended Catalonia’s right to form an independent republic and which claims to defend social democratic policies, seems to have taken the advantage. Over the past 10 years, support for this party has dramatically increased, for it has been able to cast itself as an honest galvanizer of Catalonia´s aspirations for independence. Its leader, Oriol Junqueras, who was imprisoned by the Spanish courts a few weeks ago, will run for Catalonia’s presidency, for according to Spanish law provisional prisoners can run for office. As the Catalan vice-president, Junqueras played a key role in the organization of the recent referendum, and stands a high chance of being elected the next Catalan president. ERC will run in coalition with two minor pro-independence political parties which originated from an excision of the Catalan Socialist Party (which does not support independence): Avancem and Mes. The coalition, whose name is Esquerra Republicana-Catalunya si, leads the current intention polls with a 28.4%.

Opposite transformation

On the other hand, el Partit Demòcrata Europeu Català has undergone the opposite political transformation, with a great loss of political support throughout Catalonia. Traditionally the party of the Catalan nationalist bourgeoisie, it governed the Catalan autonomous region for over 30 years, and played a key role in developing the autonomous system by bargaining more self-government for Catalonia in exchange for parliamentary support with several Spanish central governments. However, during the last years, several corruption scandals have tarnished the party’s image. These scandals coincided with the party abandoning its traditional autonomous stance for more pro-independence views. Carles Puigdemont will probably be its candidate to the presidency, running from Belgium, where he fled in order to escape Spanish justice and to raise international awareness of the Catalan “process”. Although a very popular figure among the Catalan pro-independence supporters, Puigdemont and his party will likely suffer from the dissolution of Junts Pel Si. Its voting intention stands at a meagre 10.7%, which suggests that the whole process of Catalan independence, and the party’s ideological shift, have led to its electoral decay. There was a time when the old Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya won the Catalan elections with absolute majorities, but the party may have been one of the main victims of “el procés”.

The last pro-independence party that has played a key role in the whole Catalan process is la CUP, or Candidatura d’Unitat Popular. This party defines itself as an anti-capitalist group which defends Catalonia’s right to be a republic and advocates for quitting the European Union and the Nato alliance. The party also defends the creation of policies against financial institutions, such as the nationalization of the main Catalan banks. Although relatively minor in the parliament, it garnered a lot of attention and prominence, since its numbers in parliament became essential in order to proclaim independence. Considered by many a radical and extremist leftist party, its support has also grown during the last years, especially among Catalan youth. Although it has publicly denounced these next elections as illegitimate (since these elections have been called by forces exterior to the newly proclaimed Catalan Republic), it appears Carles Riera will be its candidate to the Catalan presidency.

Although not strictly pro-independence, En Comú Podem is a relatively new party which is the result of a citizen political movement that won the Barcelona municipal elections in 2015. In future elections, Xavier Domenech will lead a coalition of small leftist parties which, despite not being specifically pro-independence, defend   Catalonia’s right to decide its relationship with Spain in a legal and binding referendum. It is associated at the State level with Podemos, a political party born out of the social movements (15M) that protested against political corruption and the Spanish economic crisis in 2011. Podemos also defends (at the national level) the right of the Catalan people to have an agreed-upon and legal referendum. Although some of the voters of En Comú Podem want independence, most of its electors defend a new and completely reformed relationship between the Spanish state and Catalonia. Furthermore, the party clearly prioritizes social aid measures to independence, for it considers that some of the serious problems Catalonia still has (such as high unemployment, poverty or a high number of people in risk of social exclusion) have been let slide into oblivion under the flag of independence.  Domènech has openly rejected what he calls “bloc politics” and promised to strive for a less confrontational approach. He aims to capitalize on the votes of the Catalans who are weary of political extremism on both sides.

Essential roles

Even though Assamblea Nacional Catalana and Omnium Cultural are not political parties, they have played an essential role in the growth of the Catalan pro-independence movement, and are part of the political spectrum. For decades, Omnium Cultural has been a civil society platform dedicated to the promotion and defense of the Catalan language, culture and popular traditions. In this process, it has contributed to spreading the view that Catalonia is a nation which can only preserve its rich culture and folklore by becoming an independent state within Europe. Assamblea Nacional Catalana is also a civil society platform. It has organized multiple massive demonstrations (including the 2012 “Diada” the first massive demonstration that drew international attention to the Catalan cause by gathering over 1.5 million people in the streets of Barcelona) and held many political assemblies around Catalonia. Both organizations joined the coalition Junts Pel Si in the 2015 election. Several of its most prominent members were elected to the Catalan parliament. Carme Forcadell, its previous leader, was the president of the Catalan parliament who declared Catalonia’s independence on October 27th. Currently, the leaders of both platforms, Jordi Sánchez and Jordi Cuixart, are in Spanish prisons awaiting trial and are considered democratic martyrs of the Catalan struggle.

Whatever the result after December 21,  Catalan political turmoil appears to be here to stay for a long time. In a society that is deeply fractured, with people supporting a wide variety of positions that go from independence to more power to the Spanish central government, it is perhaps time for real political deliberation and action. Polls give the three main pro-independence parties around 45% of vote intention, which would not contribute to unblocking the situation. This 45% would provide them again with an absolute majority in the Catalan parliament, due to the Catalan electoral system, which grants a bigger electoral weight to those provinces (Girona, Lleida and Tarragona) with fewer voters. However, with some of these parties´ leaders in jail and the Spanish state firmly opposed to any talks of secession, Catalonia’s political future might continue to make headlines for years.

 

 


Started by

Spain
I am a Political Scientist who specializes in Public Opinion, Direct Democracy and Political Misperceptions. I have a passion for international politics and believe community-based journalism with an emphasis on critical thinking and perspectivism is greatly needed. My thesis analyzed political misperceptions during the Brexit referendum campaign. I became interested in this topic when I realized that a great number of people had been manipulated during the campaign and that there was a great chance this had affected the referendum´s outcome. In a world dominated by terms like fake news and post-truth, I aim to analyze how people process information and form their political beliefs using quantitative and qualitative methods.

History for stories "Who will stand for Catalan independence in the December elections?"

Select two items to compare revisions

25 November 2017

16:44:06, 25 Nov 2017 . .‎ Jamie Morris (Updated → Typo - Removed V between two words)

22 November 2017

11:39:59, 22 Nov 2017 . .‎ Jack Barton (Updated → Conflict)

20 November 2017

19:47:21, 20 Nov 2017 . .‎ Fernando Cueva (Updated → )

17 November 2017

16 November 2017

15:55:48, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → removing inicio)
15:48:35, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → )
15:44:32, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → forcadell link)
15:42:57, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → saving)
15:40:50, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → small tidying)
15:31:30, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → embedding more links, CUP etc)
15:26:48, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → embedding links)
15:17:59, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → copy smoothing and links)
15:06:26, 16 Nov 2017 . .‎ Angela Long (Updated → copy edits, assigning hyperlinks)

Talk for Story "Who will stand for Catalan independence in the December elections?"

Talk about this Story

  1. Rewrite

    “ In 2015, the pro-independence parties (Junts pel Si and la CUP) achieved 48% of the vote, but due to the Catalan electoral system, they gained an absolute majority in the Catalan autonomous parliament”
    Certainly, they gained 52% of the seats in the Catalan parliament with just 48% of the votes.
    However, it is of the utmost importance to say that Catalonia is the only Spanish autonomy that lacks an own electoral law, so Catalonia ballots are ruled by the Spanish electoral law.
    It is thanks to that law that the Popular Party obtained 60% of the seats in the Spanish Senate with just 38% of the votes.
    Also, it should be said that independentist parties received 48% of the votes, but this does not necesarily mean that 52% of the votes were unionists. Some parties are not one thing nor the other.
    This is why a referendum is clearly needed. Unionists insist that they are a majority, but they continuously oppose to celebrate a referendum. That doesn’t seem to be fair play.

  2. Flagged as bias

    Is “Separatist” generally considered a neutral term? It has overtones to me.

    1. Rewrite

      Hi Leia,

      According to the Oxford Dictionary, “separatist” means “A person who supports the separation of a particular group of people from a larger body on the basis of ethnicity, religion, or gender.”
      I would think this applies to the Catalans who want independence? To separate from the Spanish state.

      1. Rewrite

        We all know dictionary definitions don’t always capture political and linguistic overtones though.

        “Separatist” to my mind as a term has too often to been preceded in headlines etc by “violent” to be free of overtones.

        It was (rarely) used by mainstream media for the Scottish independence campaigners for example but appears in the same media to be being used for the Catalan campaign consistently.

        There’s some discussion of this on the main Wikipedia article on the term
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Separatism#.22Separatism.22_is_loaded_language

  3. Rewrite

    Hi Andrew,

    I think the article is very thorough and accurate in the description of the pro independence parties in Catalonia.
    Nevertheless I believe the introduction might lead to misunderstandings to those who have not followed the entire “procés” , is for that reason that I feel compelled to write you.
    “Catalonia and its struggle for independence…” might lead to think that the majority of Catalonia is wiling to become independent when it is not the case as you stablish in your article later on. It might look like I am trying to split hairs but given that most of not well informed people – due to the very well prepared propaganda – assume that the great majority of the population is crying for independence but is crushed by an oppesive central government, I think it is important to pay attention to the details. More and more evidence shows that a part of the population who is being oppresed since years ago is the portion of catalonians who are against independence , just 2 examples: http://www.expansion.com/opinion/2017/10/06/59d7672ee2704e625e8b4587.htmlhttps://www.wikitribune.com/story/2017/11/01/spain/big-read-catalonias-independence-crisis-splits-families-and-friends/12173/

    In the same line, to avoid fueling this view of a helpless region being crushed when this possibility is everything but clear , I invite you to consider the phrase “Spanish central government sent police armed forces to crack down on what it deemed an illegal referendum” because if might lead to understand the situation as the government judging illegal the referendum . Of course, there is not any government of a full democracy –
    in case there is any doubt: http://imco.org.mx/politica_buen_gobierno/indice-de-democracia-2016-via-the-economist/- entittled to judge illegality, that´s the labor of the judicial power , judges are independent of executive power.
    What made the referendum illegal ( I am not considering here wether it should be so or not) is that it was against the Spanish law and the Catalonian law. Not only that ,in order to “allow them to call for the referendum” the pro independent parties jumped on their own rules (like the percentage of positive votes that would entittle them, in their own view, to call for a referendum), on the Catalonian laws, and on the Catalonian parlament.
    I give you just the first example I found http://www.publico.es/politica/catalunya-parlament-aprueba-ley-referendum-abandonar-pleno-oposicion.html
    I am not an expert, and don´t feel confortable asking you to consider rephrasing your sentence, with all the respect I propose possibilities – just inspirations – to avoid the misinterpretation of your sentence: “to crack down on what judicial power (judges, law, etc) deemed an illegal referendum” , “to crack down on an illegal referendum according to Spanish legislation”
    Thanks in any case for reading.

    Just one last thing, since you are expert in political misperceptions, fake news, etc. Apparently there were many fake news around the “procés” specially around referendum https://elpais.com/elpais/2017/10/06/inenglish/1507278297_702753.html and it also appears that russian sites fueled the conflict, to the point of the EU being concerned about it and increasing the number of workers dedicated to fight against desinformation .
    If that is so, it would be great that WikiTribune gives us some light about it. A good reason for it is that it might help ease the sad position where Catalonia – and Spain also – is , but it is also a good reason to unveil fake news and post truth just for the sake of it, because that is the core of WikiTribune and the reason why we support it and read it

    With much respect

    1. Hi Eva,

      Thank you very much for your thoughtful comment. I agree with you that the phrase “Catalonia and its struggle for independence” might lead uninformed people to believe that a great majority of Catalan people want independence. Tomorrow I will try to come up with a less confusing one. Although I totally agree that the referendum was illegal according to the Spanish Constitution and that the Catalan leaders broke the Spanish law and the Catalan “Estatut”, what I was trying to emphasize was that the use of police force did indeed send shocking images of what happened on the 1st of October around the world. I also agree that in many respects it is the non nationalist Catalan people who have been oppressed over the last years, or who have suffered in silence, but the aim of this article in particular was to describe what is happening among the pro-independence camp. I think that another article should ensue in which those parties who do not support independence are portrayed.

      I would love to write an article on Russian meddling on “el procés”, for it is greatly related to my areas of interest. Although I do not know much about the topic at this moment, I will look into it carefully and see whether I can write a piece on it. I do have, though, some skepticism on how big of a role the Russian meddling has had in this whole process, for I have been following Catalan nationalism since I studied my undergrad in Barcelona about 10 years ago and I know this social and political conflict is very real. I really appreciate your feedback and would like to invite you to read another pice I wrote on the independence of the Spanish Judiciary power.

      I look forward to more open discussions as this one,

      Andrew

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later