0011801-17AB
Medicine |Analysis

Big Read: Loss of tropical forests threatens search for antibiotics

  1. Ethnobiologists explore the world's shrinking tropical forests
  2. Forests – not big pharma – seem to hold the key on antibiotics
  3. Putting the "ant" into antibiotics

‘There are lots of plants in tropical forests that have not yet been investigated, and we’re facing an alarming rate of deforestation’ – Ethnobotanist Cassandra Quave

It’s well-established that deforestation is contributing to climate change, but its effect on the discovery of new drugs is less understood.

A recent World Health Organization report warns there’s a critical lack of new antibiotics in the pipeline to combat the threat of antibiotic resistance. Globally, 700,000 people die every year as a result of antibiotic resistance. By 2050 this is expected to rise to 10 million according to a report by The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, which was commissioned and supported by the UK Government and Wellcome Trust (although operated independently.)

But scientists believe tropical forest plants and animals could be a source of new antibiotics to replace the current stock.

After the so-called ‘golden age’ of antibiotic discovery in the 1950s and 60s, scientists appeared to have exhausted the possibilities of the actinomycetes – a bacteria from which many antibiotics can be formulated. Researchers then moved on to new methods by creating chemical compounds in a lab.

However, billions of dollars later, that didn’t bring the results pharmaceutical companies had hoped for. Many of them abandoned work on new drugs in favor of the guaranteed profitability of improving existing ones.

But a combination of over-prescription, people not finishing their course of antibiotics, which leads to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and lack of new drug discoveries has caused a rise in antibiotic resistance. This has prompted a renewed interest in deriving new drugs from natural products, often from largely untapped environments, as this piece in the Toronto Star showed.

Forest as pharmacy

One such environment is tropical forests. They cover less than seven percent (rainforest foundation) of the Earth’s surface, yet are home to about 50 percent of all land animal and plant species.

Tropical forests world map (CC BY SA 4.0)
Tropical forests world map (CC BY SA 4.0)

Drugs used to treat malaria, cancer and glaucoma all originally came from tropical forests and around 120 prescription drugs sold globally originate from rainforest plants. Forty percent of anticancer drugs available between 1940 and 2002 were made from natural or naturally-derived products.

Quinine – which is on the World Health Organisation (WHO)‘s essential medicine list, and used for treating malaria – comes from the bark of a Cinchona tree, which is found in the tropical forests of the Andes, South America. And from the Calabar bean, originating in the tropical forests of Africa, comes the drug Physostigmine, which is used to treat glaucoma – a condition where the nerve that connects the eye and brain becomes damaged and can lead to vision loss. It is the second biggest cause of blindness across the globe.

However, with more than 80,000 acres of tropical rainforest and 135 species of plants and animals being lost daily, (according to this report in The Scientific American and attributed to the FAO) extracting drugs from this environment might no longer be possible in the near future.

Cassandra Quave is an “ethnobotanist” — a scientist who works on drugs derived from plants. She says: “You have mega-corporations just destroying these forests, [while] scientists like myself have great difficulty in even accessing these biological resources to study them before they’re gone.”

amazon rainforest chopped down (CC BY 2.0)
Slash and burn agriculture in the Amazon‘ (Photo: by Matt Zimmerman, CC BY 2.0)

Partly because of deforestation, current extinction rates are 100 to 1,000 times higher than natural background rates and as many as 15,000 medicinal plants are under threat, according to botanical gardens group BGCI. Of known plant species, over 28,000 are recognized as medicinal, and many have other potential uses including as a material or food. Predictions vary, but so far less than 15 percent of plant species have been screened for their medicinal potential.

The difficult part is finding the drugs from so many plants. For every 10,000 compounds screened for medicinal properties, about 250 make it to clinical trials, according to the Milken Institute Review. Of those, only one will eventually become an approved drug.

Ethnobotanists fight back

Ethnobotanist Quave, who studies plants and their practical applications using indigenous knowledge, describes her endeavors as a “lost art.”

She leads an antibiotic drug discovery research team at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. The Quave Research Group is looking for ‘antibiotic potentiators.’ These can be used to restore effectiveness to antibiotics that have been rendered impotent by bacterial resistance. Her team is looking for treatments for super fungus Candida auris, which is resistant to many drugs.

Quave also wants to draw attention to curing fungal infections, as she says there are few chemical classes that currently treat them.

Cassandra Quave in lab (CC BY SA 3.0)
Ethnobiologist Cassandra Quave in her lab (CC BY SA 3.0)

The team she leads extracts chemical compounds from plants, traditionally used as medicines, to produce drugs. Most pharmaceutical labs now synthetically make the chemical compounds from which drugs are derived. But the Quave Group takes the natural approach: her team now has around 1,200 extracts from more than 400 different species it has collected.

The plants shipped in to the university come from south-east U.S. states like Georgia and Florida and countries in the Mediterranean basin (critical ecosystem partnership fund) and the Balkans, including Italy, Albania and Lebanon. However, Quave still gets out in the field. This summer she was out with students working on the Aegadian islands, off the coast of Sicily, because of the islands’ remoteness and endemic species.

Quave says she would like to be able to study plants from tropical forests too, but that it’s very difficult to get permits to take plant samples from countries in this environment.

“I think that there are lots of plants in tropical forests that have not yet been investigated, and we’re facing an alarming rate of deforestation in tropical forests, due to mining, logging and gold and natural resource extraction that’s just destroying large tracks of land … tropical forests are definitely one of those high risk areas where we are rapidly losing those resources for drug discovery.”

Cassandra Quave in Sicily with plant samples (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cassandra Quave in Sicily with plant samples (CC BY-SA 3.0). Instagram quaveethnobot

She is also concerned by the loss of collective memory from indigenous peoples who have used medicinal plants for thousands of years.

“We use that lens of culture also in our drug discovery efforts … knowledge of how those [plants] have been used over centuries for food and medicine, and survival,” she says. “It is important to highlight the need to record these things [plants and knowledge of their use], help preserve these areas, and create safe havens for these people before it’s all gone.”

Putting the “ant” into antibiotics

A microbiologist at the University of East Anglia, Matt Hutchings, is leading a team looking for sources of antibiotics in the nests of leafcutter ants which live in the rainforests of central and South America. Leafcutter ants could provide major breakthroughs for new antibiotics. The last natural product antibiotic to be introduced was daptomycin, discovered in 1987, so new drugs are desperately needed.

Microbiologist Matt Hutchings UEA with leafcutter ants
Microbiologist Matt Hutchings UEA with Acromyrmex echinatior leafcutter ants (Credit: CC BY SA 3.0 Matt Hutchings University of East Anglia)

He works with Acromyrmex echinatior leafcutter ants collected in Gamboa, Panama. The ants gather leaves in the rainforest and feed them to a fungus known as Leucoagaricus gongylophorus, which in return supplies them with food. Antibiotic-producing bacteria which live on the ants, known as actinomyces, are the raw material for 60 percent of known antibiotics. The ants feed the bacteria living on them through specialized glands in their exoskeletons and use the antibiotics produced by these bacteria to kill off other microbes that would otherwise infect their fungus garden. If the ants smell infected parts of the fungus they remove it, dump it away from the nest and use antifungal antibiotics to sterilize it. Ant species that farm fungi (Attini ants) have most likely been using antibiotics for more than 50 million years to protect these fungus gardens from pests.

‘They’ve been giving antibiotics out like [candy], which is the worst thing you can do.’ – microbiologist Matt Hutchings

The team Hutchings leads is isolating bacteria from the ants, and seeing if the antibiotics they produce prevent other harmful bacteria from growing. He says the team has identified antibiotics which could be very powerful against ‘superbugs’ like MRSA, (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) which has been a serious problem in hospitals.

And while Hutchings believes only 10 percent of the antibiotics that are made by actinomyces have been discovered, leaving huge room for potential, he says the problem boils down to money: “Who wants to invest billions of dollars to find new antibiotics? Drug companies don’t want to pay for it. Governments can’t afford to pay for it. Antibiotics don’t make any money, basically.”

Hutchings says while the antibiotics we have are effective, we have used them badly. “They’ve just been giving them out like [candy], which is the worst thing you can do.”

He hopes we’ve learned our lesson now, “so [that] when we develop a new generation of antibiotics, they’ll be used very carefully.”

Leafcutter ants fungus garden chamber
Leafcutter ants fungus garden chamber (Credit: CC BY SA 3.0 Matt Hutchings University of East Anglia)

We have no ads and no paywall. If you believe in collaboration to produce quality neutral journalism for everyone, it is important that you sign up to support our work financially. Every penny goes towards improving WikiTribune!
Thanks, Jimmy Wales

Support us

Sources & References

References

 

Additional Sources of interest


Author

United Kingdom
Harry is a masters graduand from Cardiff University, with a diploma in Magazine Journalism. He has an interest in politics and science, having previously studied Geography at Aberystwyth University. Follow Harry on Twitter @harryridgewell

History for Story "Big Read: Loss of tropical forests threatens search for antibiotics"

Select two items to compare revisions

  1. Time Contributor Edit
  2. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) fixing format
  3. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Minor change to paragraph two
  4. Holly Brockwell Holly Brockwell (Contributions | Talk) Subediting
  5. Holly Brockwell Holly Brockwell (Contributions | Talk)
  6. Holly Brockwell Holly Brockwell (Contributions | Talk) Tidying up, editing
  7. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Adding link to superbugs
  8. CQ Cassandra Quave (Contributions | Talk) fixed quote
  9. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) improving and trying to fix
  10. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk)
  11. AH Alan Hewitt (Contributions | Talk) Adding a bit of detail regarding the Review on Antimicrobial Resistance
  12. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) changed one word
  13. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Final edit and filed, changed primary category
  14. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edits
  15. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Final edit, pending Harry adding some references
  16. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) putting in hero pic
  17. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) small copy fixes
  18. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edit
  19. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) updated sources and references
  20. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edits
  21. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) small copy edit prevents to prevent
  22. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) awkward phrase
  23. Charles Anderson Charles Anderson (Contributions | Talk) quality control
  24. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) removing bold
  25. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) rewording,tightening
  26. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) deleting editor's question
  27. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) final save
  28. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) sci museum link
  29. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) pulling out quote/taking superbugs
  30. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) copy fixes for clarity
  31. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edits
  32. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) moved picture
  33. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added pictures
  34. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) Science Museum mention and link space
  35. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) tightening
  36. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) ref to hutchings and link
  37. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) copy edits
  38. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) copy sculpting
  39. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) first link to global warming effect
  40. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) copy edit
  41. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) grammar
  42. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edits
  43. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) improved
  44. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) restructing
  45. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edit
  46. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) fixing picture
  47. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) reinserting picture
  48. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) adding links and sources
  49. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) commas
  50. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added picture
  51. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) adding pictures
  52. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) adding more
  53. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) minor edit
  54. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) adding more
  55. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) update
  56. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) changing summary
  57. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) author questions and copy fixes
  58. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) BCGI link on 70,000
  59. Angela Long Angela Long (Contributions | Talk) running out link
  60. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) improved
  61. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) removed twitter
  62. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) removed unnecessary links
  63. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) Americanized headline
  64. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added highlights, words and reference
  65. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added highlights
  66. MB Maciej Boni (Contributions | Talk) Fixed spelling of Eli Lilly (was "Lily")
  67. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added space
  68. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) experiment moving references to sources box
  69. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) updated references
  70. Fiona Apps Fiona Apps (Contributions | Talk) Ref changed
  71. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) changed bibliography
  72. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) 'Sources' section isn't displaying stuff so moved back to main text of article
  73. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) moved bibliography, references and additional sources to 'sources' section
  74. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) improving bibliography
  75. CV Cassandra Vinograd (Contributions | Talk) flipped headline to make active stedda passive
  76. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) removed some bolding
  77. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) bolded synopsis
  78. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) style changes
  79. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) updated bibliography and added twitter handle
  80. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) removing bibliography links
  81. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Updated links, Editor
  82. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added two words
  83. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) bibliography changed
  84. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) another restructure
  85. Peter Bale Peter Bale (Contributions | Talk) Adds and suggestions and comments, Editor
  86. JC Jonathan Cardy (Contributions | Talk) copy edit
  87. Charles Turner Charles Turner (Contributions | Talk) moved thesis, restructured lede, removed redundancy
  88. Linh Nguyen Linh Nguyen (Contributions | Talk) edited
  89. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) updated bibliography and changed sentence
  90. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) deleted space
  91. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) added video
  92. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk)
  93. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk)
  94. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk)
  95. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk)
  96. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) bibliography added
  97. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) changed sentence
  98. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) deleted space
  99. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) embedded most links
  100. Harry Ridgewell Harry Ridgewell (Contributions | Talk) first draft

Talk for Story "Big Read: Loss of tropical forests threatens search for antibiotics"

Talk about this Story

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu RSS Feed Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later