United States |Developing

Thousands of JFK assassination papers released — but not all

The WikiTribune community is asked to highlight details from the declassified documents on the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Who killed John F. Kennedy?

Was it really a solitary ex-Marine with ties to the Soviet Union who happened to be working in a Dallas warehouse when the president’s motorcade rolled into his rifle sights on November 22, 1963?

More than 50 years later, alternative theories persist: Was there a second gunman, or a different gunman, or a plot by the CIA, the Mafia, Fidel Castro, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson or others?

Reporters, historians and conspiracy buffs began poring through thousands of pages of once-secret FBI, CIA and other U.S. government documents released this week. They were looking for evidence to challenge the official orthodoxy that a lone sniper, Lee Harvey Oswald, killed America’s 35th president.

The 2,891 records posted online late Thursday by the U.S. government’s National Archives were fewer than anticipated.

More than 3,100 remaining files relating to the assassination were to be declassified by October 26 under a 1992 law that required the documents to be made public after 25 years. President Donald J. Trump, however, ordered hundreds of documents to remain classified for more review.

“This temporary withholding from full public disclosure is necessary to protect against harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in immediate disclosure,” Trump said in a memo reported by the Washington Post. He granted six more months of review.

Some of the records had been completely blocked from public view, while others were being released to lift redactions from previous disclosures.

Trump said he had no choice but to withhold the remaining documents after requests from the intelligence services. Clearly, however, conspiracy theorists and even historians just wanting to get to the bottom of the story, were disappointed that information remained withheld.

“My expectations were low, and they should have been lower,” Gerald Posner, author of the 1993 Kennedy assassination book Case Closed, was quoted as saying in Saturday’s Washington Post.

Wikileaks, the free speech activist group led by Julian Assange from self-imposed exile inside the Ecuadorean embassy in London offered a $100,000 reward for information on the remaining papers.

Wikileaks says it offers $100,000 reward for remaining JFK documents.

The WikiTribune community is encouraged to go through declassified documents, and news coverage, to compile what we learned, and what information is still missing. This will be then be assessed and added to the overall story.

Highlights from released documents

Background of the assassination 

Kennedy, 46, was shot on November 22, 1963, as he traveled in an open-topped car on a motorcade through Dallas. Oswald, 24, an employee of a schoolbook warehouse along the motorcade route, was arrested hours after the slaying. Oswald was shot to death two days later while in police custody by a 52-year-old Dallas nightclub owner, Jack Ruby.

A government inquiry known as the Warren Commission concluded that both men acted alone. The killings sparked numerous conspiracy theories.

Oswald, a former U.S. Marine who defected to the Soviet Union in 1959, returned to America with his Russian wife in 1962 and eventually settled in Dallas, according to the Warren Commission. He was employed at the Texas School Book Depository overlooking Dealey Plaza when Kennedy’s well-publicized motorcade drove through.

The inquiry found Oswald fired three rifle shots from the sixth-floor window of the depository. While the first shot missed the presidential limousine, a second shot struck Kennedy and seriously wounded Texas Governor John Connolly, who was riding in the car with the president. The third shot struck Kennedy’s head, according to the Warren Commission.

Oswald denied shooting anyone, saying, “I’m just a patsy.”

On November 24, 1963, while authorities were transferring Oswald from Dallas police headquarters to the county jail, Ruby emerged from a crowd of reporters and shot him in a scene shown on live television. Ruby was tried for murder, but his conviction and death sentence were overturned. Before a new trial could be conducted, he died in 1967.

Be the change. Support WikiTribune's mission to fix the news - Jimmy Wales

Support us

Talk (3)

Dimitrios Samaras

"Ethan is absolutely right. Wikipedia ..."

Ethan Glover

"Why is Wikileaks called a "free-speec..."

Peter Bale

"Great approach thank you and I hope t..."

Author

Pete Young is a former editor for The New York Times and Bloomberg News. A journalist for more than 40 years, he also taught reporting and editing as an adjunct professor at New York University.

History for Story "Thousands of JFK assassination papers released — but not all"

  1. Cassandra Vinograd shortens summary
  2. Peter Bale Minor update on Saturday
  3. Linh Nguyen J. Trump, Heading 2
  4. Charles Anderson update
  5. Pete Young refined he'd
  6. Pete Young updated headline
  7. Pete Young Removing repeated first ref to Oswald
  8. Pete Young Adding total docs expected
  9. Pete Young New top
  10. Charles Turner remove kissinger highlight
  11. Charles Turner first highlight
  12. Charles Anderson links
  13. Charles Anderson kick off project
  14. Charles Turner merge
  15. Pete Young small rewording in summary
  16. Pete Young Highlighting request for public input
  17. Pete Young Further update
  18. Pete Young
  19. Pete Young
  20. Pete Young Adds Oswald quote, Ruby background
  21. Pete Young Update with Trump action
  22. Charles Turner merging
  23. Charles Turner edit through
  24. Pete Young Adds Dealey plaza and 3 shots
  25. Pete Young trump background
  26. Pete Young refinements
  27. Pete Young refinements
  28. Pete Young Background

Thousands of JFK assassination papers released — but not all

Talk about this Story

  1. Rewrite

    Why is Wikileaks called a “free-speech activist group?” That’s inaccurate to say the least, and why the link to its Wikipedia page? Neither it or Wikileaks themselves calls it a “free-speech activist group.” The Wikileaks about page is more accurate, “…specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise restricted official materials…”

    As for the links to Wikipedia, they can be removed. They’re totally unnecessary and as much as I love it..it’s not a source. You could then replace the Wikileaks link to the home page to one that goes to their about page.

    Then a link to the Tweet would be best, if possible the screenshot should be replaced with an embed. (But always keep those screenshots on backup in case of deletion!)

    1. Rewrite

      Ethan is absolutely right. Wikipedia is not a source when there are the actual websites of the people involved.

  2. Other

    Great approach thank you and I hope the audience feels able to approach it in the same spirit. Peter

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Open menu Close menu Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later