Culture |Essay

Shostakovich vs Stalin – a glimpse into cultural and artistic life inside the Soviet Union

To hear what it was like to live through Stalin’s Russia, you have but to listen to the changing music of Dmitri Shostakovich.

The 1917 revolution that would change the worlds of government and economics also played out in the arts. Under the Communist regime, composers such as Shostakovich were expected to glorify the achievements of the working class in a new style that came to be known as socialist realism, as directed by the People’s Commissariat of Enlightenment.

Some artists, such as the composer Igor Stravinsky and the Ballets Russes founder Sergei Diaghilev, fled to the West. Certain others who stayed, such as the composer Dmitry Kabalevsky, put their art second to the regime’s requirements.

Shostakovich, coming of age amid the ferment, seemed determined to maintain artistic independence — setting him on a collision course with the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin.

Born in 1906 in St. Petersburg, Shostakovich entered the Petrograd Conservatory at 13. His Symphony No. 1 in F minor, written at 18, was his graduation piece. He came to prominence in Russian cultural life, initially as a concert pianist. His compositions won him the admiration of legendary conductors Bruno Walter and Leopold Stokowski, who premiered his First Symphony in Berlin and Philadelphia, respectively.

Inside Moscow's Bolshoi Theatre, where Stalin attended Shostakovich's Lady Macbeth. By Theefer (Theefer) [CC BY-SA 2.0] via Wikimedia Commons
Inside Moscow’s Bolshoi Theatre, where Stalin attended Shostakovich’s Lady Macbeth. By Theefer (Theefer) [CC BY-SA 2.0] via Wikimedia Commons

His success rose with a hit opera, “Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District,” based on a novel by Nikolai Leskov that drew its title from Shakespeare’s murderous female character. Shostakovich’s adaptation tells how Katerina, a bored merchant’s wife, takes one of her husband’s employees as a lover, then sets off on a string of killings including her husband, father-in-law, her lover’s new mistress and finally herself.

On Jan. 26, 1936, Shostakovich arrived at the Bolshoi Theater for a performance of the opera, to find Stalin and the Politburo in the audience. Seated in a box above the orchestra, the officials shuddered during the opera’s loud passages and laughed at its love scenes.  The dictator walked out after the third of four acts.

Two days later, an unsigned review appeared on page 3 of Pravda, the Communist Party’s official newspaper, under the headline “Muddle Instead of Music” (a translated version is carried by history website historyinanhour). In 10 paragraphs describing the work, the anonymous editorialist used “coarse,” “coarsest” and “coarseness” five times, and “vulgar” four times.

“The music quacks, grunts, and growls,” borrowing from jazz that “tickles the perverted taste of the bourgeois with its fidgety, neurotic music.” Shostakovich “scribbles down his music, confusing all the sounds in such a way that his music would reach only the effete ‘formalists’ who had lost all their wholesome taste,” the article said. “He ignored the demand of Soviet culture that all coarseness and savagery be abolished from every corner of Soviet life.”

Ironically, Lady Macbeth had been critically well received and acclaimed for its adherence to “socialist realism” prior to Stalin’s visit to the Bolshoi and the subsequent Pravda article – with one Moscow publication, Sovetskaya Muzyka, calling it “the best Soviet work, the chef-d’oeuvre of Soviet creativity.”

Pravda’s view seemed to have been at least partly inflamed by the opera’s moral stance. The review condemned the sympathetic portrayal of the murderess. “Some critics call the glorification of the merchants’ lust a satire,” it said. “But there is no question of satire here. The composer has tried, with all the musical and dramatic means at his command, to arouse the sympathy of the spectators for the coarse and vulgar inclinations and behavior of the merchant woman Katerina Izmailova.”

To judge from the review, Stalin may also have had a problem accepting or even comprehending Shostakovich’s complex, nuanced musical language.

“From the first minute, the listener is shocked by deliberate dissonance, by a confused stream of sound,” Pravda said. “Snatches of melody, the beginnings of a musical phrase, are drowned, emerge again, and disappear in a grinding and squealing roar. To follow this ‘music’ is most difficult; to remember it, impossible.”

To be denounced in this way was no idle matter. Within months of the review, what came to be known as the Great Purge was under way, bringing accusations of political crimes and conspiracies, torture, show trials, labor camps and executions. By the time it ended in 1938, an estimated 200,000 to 600,000 people died at the hands of the government.

At the time the review appeared, Shostakovich was writing his Fourth Symphony and had planned its premiere for later that year. Rehearsals with the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra had already begun when he withdrew the work.

Whether he did so on his own, or under pressure, is debated. With its Morse-code-like percussion “signals” at the end of the second movement and, above all, its somber ending, with a long-held C-minor chord from the strings and the celesta, the Fourth Symphony was grim and foreboding. It would be almost a decade after Stalin’s death before it was finally performed in 1961.

Shostakovich, to keep a low profile, for two years wrote film music — a medium considered safer to work in, as it was both favored by Stalin and devoid of political content — even as he was preparing his Fifth Symphony, which premiered on Nov. 21, 1937.

The composition reverted to a more conservative form, structure and harmonic and melodic style. Biographer Elizabeth Wilson, in Shostakovich: A Life Remembered, said even Kabalevsky, who had distanced himself from Shostakovich at the time of the Pravda editorial, now congratulated him for “not having given in to the seductive temptations of his previous ‘erroneous’ ways.”

A few days before the Fifth Symphony’s premiere, an article appeared in the Moscow newspaper Vechernyaya Moskva, describing the work as “a Soviet artist’s creative response to justified criticism.” It was seen as Shostakovich’s recantation, and returned him to official approval.

The article was purportedly written by the composer. Whether Shostakovich or someone more closely connected with the Party actually wrote it is open to question, but the phrase “justified criticism” has been associated with the symphony ever since.

While musically more conservative than his previous works, the ending to the Fifth Symphony is still ambiguous. Its triumphant chords, brass fanfare and timpani notes gave the impression of following the Soviet model, due, in part, to their tonal, excessive reiteration of the D major key, for a pleasing, celebratory finish.

But the repeated string notes, the B flat notes (instead of the more conventional B natural) in the brass and the insistent drum blows, which continue right until the very last notes of the symphony, paint a picture of suffering.

In a world where ambiguity could be a key to survival, it was perhaps the best response Shostakovich could make to the “muddle instead of music” episode – a tale he literally lived to tell.

Be the change. Support WikiTribune's mission to fix the news - Jimmy Wales

Support us

Talk (4)

Vlad Bourceanu

"Thanks! I've further polished it a li..."

Jean-Jacques Subrenat

"Thanks Vlad for an interesting piece...."

Peter Bale

"Vlad, thank you, Jack Barton is going..."

Vlad Bourceanu

"I've re-written the story following t..."


Vlad holds a Bachelor of Music degree and a Graduate Diploma in Law. He is also an accredited civil and commercial mediator. In between 2007 and 2013, Vlad contributed regular classical music and theatre reviews to the Harrow Observer - one of the former main regional newspapers in north-west Greater London, in the United Kingdom. He is fluent in English, Italian and Romanian.

History for Story "Shostakovich vs Stalin – a glimpse into cultural and artistic life inside the Soviet Union"

  1. Jack Barton formatting
  2. Jack Barton Formatting
  3. Jack Barton Formatting
  4. Vlad Bourceanu corrected spacing after photo so writing looks the correct size
  5. Jack Barton Pictures
  6. Vlad Bourceanu "timpani" instead of "drums" in the antepenultimate paragraph, for accuracy
  7. Vlad Bourceanu added "the Great Purge" link to Wikipedia source
  8. Vlad Bourceanu removed the links to sources in the footer, as they are already in the article itself
  9. Vlad Bourceanu should be READY FOR REVIEW now
  10. Vlad Bourceanu still editing and adding links - saving for now
  11. Pete Young
  12. Vlad Bourceanu changed an assertion in the last paragraph to "legend has it", to better reflect controversy on this
  13. Jack Barton Edits, shortened sentences
  14. Jack Barton New picture
  15. Vlad Bourceanu removed comment about "Communist ears" as it was my unsubstantiated opinion only
  16. Vlad Bourceanu expanded comments about "ambiguity", for greater clarity of the point I tried to make
  17. Vlad Bourceanu technical correction in the last paragraph (swapping "from" and "of")
  18. Vlad Bourceanu edited 5th Symphony paragraph
  19. Vlad Bourceanu modified the Stalin / Lady Macbeth performance paragraph
  20. Vlad Bourceanu added link about Nikolai Leskov
  21. Vlad Bourceanu added the "social realism" quote from the Pravda article itself
  22. Vlad Bourceanu added info about D.S. failing his Marxist methodology exam and about his 1st Symphony, an early work
  23. Vlad Bourceanu added link to the full "muddle instead of music" article
  24. Vlad Bourceanu added the words "one paragraph" to the muddle instead of music comments, for clarity
  25. Vlad Bourceanu added "at first glance" in the 5th Symphony paragraph, for clarity
  26. Vlad Bourceanu added material to the Fifth Symphony paragraphs
  27. Vlad Bourceanu changed "works" to "key works" in the last paragraph
  28. Vlad Bourceanu added reference to DS's String Quartet No. 8 in the DSCH section and in the sources section
  29. Vlad Bourceanu added to the "muddle instead of music" subtitle
  30. Vlad Bourceanu changed "article" to "editorial article" in the "muddle instead of music" paragraph
  31. Vlad Bourceanu changed "potential" to "positive effect"
  32. Vlad Bourceanu added a few words to the paragraph prior to the DSCH section
  33. Vlad Bourceanu re-wrote some of the "muddle instead of music" paragraph
  34. Vlad Bourceanu added a phrase about Shostakovich's initial excitement at Stalin's presence
  35. Vlad Bourceanu changed "although" to "though" in the 2nd paragraph
  36. Vlad Bourceanu added "permanently" in the 2nd paragraph to make meaning clear
  37. Vlad Bourceanu added sentence about Stravinsky's 1962 Leningrad temporary visit (2nd paragraph)
  38. Vlad Bourceanu added reference to "socialist realism" in both body of article and sources section
  39. Vlad Bourceanu corrected "Josef" to "Joseph" - Stalin's first name
  40. Vlad Bourceanu punctuation corrections in the Mravinsky paragraph
  41. Vlad Bourceanu clarified meaning of accusations against D.S. in the Pravda paragraph
  42. Vlad Bourceanu "symphony" replaced with "opera" in the Pravda paragraph
  43. Vlad Bourceanu correction of Pravda page number and punctuation corrections
  44. Vlad Bourceanu punctuation edit, added the word "final" in the last paragraph
  45. Vlad Bourceanu added sub-headings
  46. Vlad Bourceanu developed the penultimate paragraph a little
  47. Vlad Bourceanu removed YouTube video and explanatory caption
  48. Vlad Bourceanu added YouTube video
  49. Vlad Bourceanu corrected spelling error in Kabalevsky's first name
  50. Vlad Bourceanu a few more minor edits, for clarity
  51. Vlad Bourceanu minor edit
  52. Vlad Bourceanu added links to the Sources section
  53. Vlad Bourceanu minor edits
  54. Vlad Bourceanu finished adding sources in the body of the article; now to add them in the sources section
  55. Vlad Bourceanu continuing to add sources
  56. Vlad Bourceanu finished re-writing the article from scratch, yet to add all the sources
  57. Vlad Bourceanu re-write in progress
  58. Vlad Bourceanu re-writing following data deletion. not yet ready
  59. Linh Nguyen made some comments
  60. Vlad Bourceanu corrected spelling mistakes
  61. Vlad Bourceanu added YouTube links
  62. Vlad Bourceanu edited title for accuracy
  63. Vlad Bourceanu For the "October Revolution" WikiProject - a first version, contributions/suggestions welcome!
  64. Vlad Bourceanu still adding sources, still NOT ready for review
  65. Vlad Bourceanu first draft - adding sources - still NOT ready for review
  66. Vlad Bourceanu first draft - NOT ready for review
  67. Vlad Bourceanu very first draft - NOT ready for submission for review!

Shostakovich vs Stalin – a glimpse into cultural and artistic life inside the Soviet Union

Talk about this Story

  1. Thanks! I’ve further polished it a little last night, so am very curious to see how the final article will look like. Many thanks once more.

  2. Thanks Vlad for an interesting piece. It might be helpful for WikiTribune readers to look up 2 authors on Shostakovich: – Elizabeth Wilson “Shostakovich: A Life Remembered”, often referred to as a reliable English-language biography of the composer, and – Julian Barnes ”The Noise of Time” which is a novel, based in part on the biography by Wilson.

  3. Vlad, thank you, Jack Barton is going to edit this and include it in the Russia package. Peter

  4. I’ve re-written the story following the data loss. Feedback welcome!

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Open menu Close menu Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later