Briefing: Senator says Trump risks ‘WWIII’, U.S. withdraws from clean power plan, Turkey-U.S. row grows

Talk (6)


Bert Edwards

"The 'What we're reading' item on the ..."

Giota Alevizou

"If this is a diplomacy briefing, why ..."
Charles Turner

Charles Turner

"Thank you, Pete. Large-scale factorie..."
Pete Young

Pete Young

"Hi, folks. The first time in the Brie..."

WikiTribune is tracking these stories and more. Please collaborate with us on the Briefing: to propose a change or make a change directly please go to EDIT or TALK on the top right of this page



  • A new proposal by the U.S. government ties any new deal on young undocumented immigrants to a list of hardline immigration demands. These include: banning immigrants from bringing their extended family members, the creation of a points-based system for migrants, and most controversially, constructing a border wall with Mexico.
    • Last month U.S. President Donald J. Trump ended the Obama-era “Dreamer” program which had protected about 800,000 immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally, including many who were born there. Democrats rejected the latest proposals.
  • The U.S. and Turkey suspended most visa services between the two countries. Non-immigrant visas are still being issued to those travelling to the U.S. for tourism, medical treatment, business, temporary work or study. The move by both countries comes after a U.S. consulate worker in Istanbul was held last week on suspicion of links to U.S. based cleric, Fethullah Gulen. The Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan blames Gulen for starting last year’s failed coup.
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s party reportedly agreed a new immigration policy with its coalition partner, the Christian Social Union (CSU). The CSU leader, Horst Seehofer, called for migrant numbers to be restricted to 200,000 a year after Merkel allowed in 1.3 million mainly Middle Eastern migrants and refugees from 2015. The chancellor is opposed to caps but said she does not want to repeat a large influx of immigrants.
  • The National Rifle Association is against a ban on the device which turns rifles into automatic weapons and allowed the killer in the Las Vegas massacre to lay down sustained fire onto a crowd of people. Stephen Paddock, 64, fitted 12 of his weapons with “bump-stock” devices that allowed semi-automatic rifles to operate as if they were fully automatic machine guns, which are otherwise outlawed in the United States. He killed 58 people during the attack. Last week the NRA said it supported regulation of the bump stocks. However, the NRA’s chief lobbyist Chris Cox told Fox News:  “We don’t believe that bans have ever worked on anything. What we have said has been very clear – that if something transfers a semiautomatic to function like a fully automatic, then it ought to be regulated differently.”
  • United States regional military bases will be at risk if further sanctions are passed against Iran, according to the head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. The warning came after the White House said President Donald Trump would announce a new response to Iran’s missile tests, support for “terrorism” and cyber operations. “As we’ve announced in the past, if America’s new law for sanctions is passed, this country will have to move their regional bases outside the 2,000 km range of Iran’s missiles,” commander Mohammad Ali Jafari said, according to state media.
  • Hundreds of thousands of people took to Barcelona’s streets to express their opposition to declaring independence from Spain. Local police estimated 350,000 people waved Spanish and Catalan flags and carried banners saying “Catalonia is Spain” and “Together we are stronger.” The protest comes after politicians on both sides hardened their positions in the country’s worst political crisis for decades.

What we’re reading

  • The Founders never intended to create an unregulated individual right to a gun. Today, millions believe they did. Here’s how it happened. As Politico reports, The National Rifle Association’s long crusade to bring its interpretation of the second amendment of the Constitution shows that Constitutional change is the product of public argument and political manoeuvring. “The pro-gun movement may have started with scholarship, but then it targeted public opinion and shifted the organs of government. By the time the issue reached the Supreme Court, the desired new doctrine fell like a ripe apple from a tree.”
  • Richard Spencer, the president of white nationalist think tank the National Policy Institute, protested again in Charlottesville, after leading a fascist march against the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue in August, which ended with the death of Heather Heyer. In a piece in The Washington Post, he says: “We wanted to prove that we came in peace in May; we came in peace in August, and we come again in peace…we will keep coming back.”

Started by

New Zealand
Charles Anderson is a New Zealand-based editor with WikiTribune. His work has appeared in the International New York Times, the Guardian, the Sydney Morning Herald and National Geographic Traveller.

History for stories "Briefing: Senator says Trump risks ‘WWIII’, U.S. withdraws from clean power plan, Turkey-U.S. row grows"

Select two items to compare revisions

21 January 2018

Talk for Story "Briefing: Senator says Trump risks ‘WWIII’, U.S. withdraws from clean power plan, Turkey-U.S. row grows"

Talk about this Story

  1. Rewrite

    The ‘What we’re reading’ item on the Politico NRA piece starts with a sentence directly extracted from the article’s sub-title that implies the article’s premise is an accepted fact. Maybe not exactly bias, but a poor choice. I’d suggest more neutral introductory wording such as: Politico asserts “The Founders never intended…”

    I’d also suggest [adjustments] in this sentence: The National Rifle Association’s long crusade to bring its interpretation of the second amendment of the Constitution [into the mainstream] shows that Constitutional change is the product of public argument and political manoeuvring. …(Not sure if manoeuvring is a typo or British form.)

  2. Rewrite

    If this is a diplomacy briefing, why the article starts with: ‘Wildfires continue to spread in Northern California in the United States, killing at least 10 people and forcing 20,000 others to evacuate their homes. …..”

    I think the titles are too long and, to an extent, misleading what this is about. I’d suggest you either switch to a rolling story (with thematic coherence) or some other sort of title that signifies an ensemble of diplomacy current affairs or similar…

  3. Rewrite

    Hi, folks. The first time in the Briefing is wrong.

    — “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will withdraw from the Clean Power Plan which aims to lower greenhouse emissions from large factories.”

    The Trump administration proposes to scrap the Obama administration’s climate change rule for power plants, not “large factories.” That’s why it’s called the “Clean POWER Plan.”

    Further, use of “withdraw” here is misleading. Its not like “withdrawing” from the Paris accord, which was an international agreement. This action could best be described as revoking or rescinding.

    1. Rewrite

      Thank you, Pete. Large-scale factories does imply manufacturing which is incorrect. Will change now.

  4. Rewrite

    Hi, I suggest a small change in that Gulen should be referred to as a US-based cleric. He has lived there since 1999 and has permanent residence, but the modification indicates that he is not actually American.


Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, alerts and updates

Support Us

Why this is important and why you should care about facts, journalism and democracy

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Previous page Next page Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Email us Message us on Facebook Messenger Save for Later