• Revision ID 42794 REVISION
  • 2018-01-22 09:57:44
  • by Angela Long (talk | contribs)
  • Note: Edelman link and small tweaks
 
   
Title Title
Public trust plummets in the U.S. but booms in China - survey  Public trust plummets in U.S. but booms in China - survey
Summary Summary
A survey of 28 countries finds that the U.S. public confidence in institutions dropped dramatically in 2017  A survey of 28 countries finds that U.S. public confidence in institutions dropped dramatically in 2017
Highlights Highlights
Content Content
<strong>Public trust in U.S. government, media, and other institutions plunged during the first year of Donald J. Trump’s controversial presidency, according to new research.</strong> <strong>Public trust in U.S. government, media, and other institutions plunged during the first year of Donald J. Trump’s controversial presidency, according to new research.</strong>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman, a global public relations firm, said that U.S. public confidence suffered the biggest fall since the group began its annual study of attitudes in 2001.</span>  <span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman, a <a href="https://www.edelman.com/about-us">global public relations firm</a>, said that U.S. public confidence suffered the biggest fall since the group began its annual study of attitudes in 2001.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The “</span><a href="https://www.edelman.com/trust-barometer/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">annual barometer</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">,” released January 21, surveyed 1,150 people in 28 countries, more than 33,000 responses in total. It then breaks their answers down by sector and whether the respondent is considered a “general” or “informed” member of the public.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">The “</span><a href="https://www.edelman.com/trust-barometer/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">annual barometer</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">,” released January 21, surveyed 1,150 people in 28 countries, more than 33,000 responses in total. It then breaks their answers down by sector and whether the respondent is considered a “general” or “informed” member of the public.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The U.S. saw the biggest drop in trust overall, and among the “informed public” trust fell to the bottom of the global rankings.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">The U.S. saw the biggest drop in trust overall, and among the “informed public” trust fell to the bottom of the global rankings.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall, the U.S. general public scored 43 out of 100 on the “trust index” – a nine-point drop on 2017, the year when Edelman said trust was “in crisis” around the world. </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall, the U.S. general public scored 43 out of 100 on the “trust index” – a nine-point drop on 2017, the year when Edelman said trust was “in crisis” around the world. </span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Trust in China rose the most, increasing seven points among the general population.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Trust in China rose the most, increasing seven points among the general population.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Last year’s barometer found that Americans’ trust in the media was at an all-time low, and that distrust in media and government had been a core theme of the 2016 election, with both much higher among Trump voters than supporters of his rival Hillary Clinton.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Last year’s barometer found that Americans’ trust in the media was at an all-time low, and that distrust in media and government had been a core theme of the 2016 election, with both much higher among Trump voters than supporters of his rival Hillary Clinton.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman’s Tonia Ries told </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">WikiTribune</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that the purpose of separating “informed” from general public is to find “opinion leaders.”</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman’s Tonia Ries told </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">WikiTribune</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that the purpose of separating “informed” from general public is to find “opinion leaders.”</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Apparently arbitrary distinctions such as college education, age, and being in a high-income bracket are useful parameters to find members of the population who are likely to be in a position to influence others, she said.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Apparently arbitrary distinctions such as college education, age, and being in a high-income bracket are useful parameters to find members of the population who are likely to be in a position to influence others, she said.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Ries admitted that “the rise of social platforms led to a dispersion of authority and a shift of influence to peer voices,” but keeping the same research parameters to those used when the study was established in 2000 means the results can better demonstrate global trends and changes.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Ries admitted that “the rise of social platforms led to a dispersion of authority and a shift of influence to peer voices,” but keeping the same research parameters to those used when the study was established in 2000 means the results can better demonstrate global trends and changes.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">President Trump has regularly been accused of stoking distrust in the media. On January 17, he </span><a href="https://www.wikitribune.com/story/2018/01/18/media/breakdown-trumps-fake-news-awards-what-would-yours-be/40049/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">named the recipients of the “Fake News Awards,”</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> sarcastic accolades for allegedly dishonest reporting about his government.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">President Trump has regularly been accused of stoking distrust in the media. On January 17, he </span><a href="https://www.wikitribune.com/story/2018/01/18/media/breakdown-trumps-fake-news-awards-what-would-yours-be/40049/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">named the recipients of the “Fake News Awards,”</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> sarcastic accolades for allegedly dishonest reporting about his government.</span>
<h2><b>Barometer-in-brief</b></h2> <h2><b>Barometer-in-brief</b></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">As in the 2017 barometer, trust and distrust in the media was split among party lines, with a 34-point difference between Trump voters, 27 percent of whom trust the media, compared with Clinton voters, whose trust in media reached 61 percent.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">As in the 2017 barometer, trust and distrust in the media was split among party lines, with a 34-point difference between Trump voters, 27 percent of whom trust the media, compared with Clinton voters, whose trust in media reached 61 percent.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Globally, the media was found to be the least trusted of the sectors surveyed, ranking lower than government, business, and NGOs.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Globally, the media was found to be the least trusted of the sectors surveyed, ranking lower than government, business, and NGOs.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">However, while trust in media “platforms” broadly declined, trust in “journalism” enjoyed a boost, rising five points.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">However, while trust in media “platforms” broadly declined, trust in “journalism” enjoyed a boost, rising five points.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">This fitted with a broader pattern globally, with participants appearing to become more discerning in who they pay attention to. Journalists recovered 12 percentage points across the general population from 2017, but “experts” generally all rose across the world. People said they were less likely to trust laymen, or people they considered as informed as themselves. </span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">This fitted with a broader pattern globally, with participants appearing to become more discerning in who they pay attention to. Journalists recovered 12 percentage points across the general population from 2017, but “experts” generally all rose across the world. People said they were less likely to trust laymen, or people they considered as informed as themselves. </span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">While 63 percent said they do not know how to tell good journalism from “fake news,” 59 percent said it is becoming harder to tell the difference.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">While 63 percent said they do not know how to tell good journalism from “fake news,” 59 percent said it is becoming harder to tell the difference.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Finally, the report recommends that countries where trust fell dramatically, such as the U.S., India, Colombia, and Brazil, should “guard information quality” and “drive economic prosperity” to reignite public trust.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Finally, the report recommends that countries where trust fell dramatically, such as the U.S., India, Colombia, and Brazil, should “guard information quality” and “drive economic prosperity” to reignite public trust.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman CEO Richard Edelman will present the results of the study at the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 21.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Edelman CEO Richard Edelman will present the results of the study at the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 21.</span>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Polling group Pew </span><a href="http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/01/11/publics-globally-want-unbiased-news-coverage-but-are-divided-on-whether-their-news-media-deliver/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">released similar research</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> on January 18, finding that there is a global consensus that media should not favor one political party over another. Pew’s research found that partisanship was the biggest problem most people have with their media.</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">Polling group Pew </span><a href="http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/01/11/publics-globally-want-unbiased-news-coverage-but-are-divided-on-whether-their-news-media-deliver/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">released similar research</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> on January 18, finding that there is a global consensus that media should not favor one political party over another. Pew’s research found that partisanship was the biggest problem most people have with their media.</span>
Categories Categories
Business, Current Affairs, Economics, Education, Elections, Media, North America, Politics, United States, Media Business, Current Affairs, Economics, Education, Elections, Media, North America, Politics, United States, Media
Article type Article type
emerging emerging
Tags Tags
Davos, Donald J Trump, Edelman, Fake news Davos, Donald J Trump, Edelman, Fake news
Author byline Author byline
No No
Has hero Has hero
No No
Hero Alignment Hero Alignment
No No
Hero Image URL Hero Image URL
None None
Featured Image URL Featured Image URL
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wikitribune-uploads-master/2018/01/Trump-speaking-at-a-conference.jpg https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wikitribune-uploads-master/2018/01/Trump-speaking-at-a-conference.jpg
Sources Sources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Be the first to collaborate on our developing articles

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Connect with us on Discord Email us