Talk for Article "Trump denies ‘shithole countries’ comment as global anger grows"

Talk about this Article

  1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    The reporting on this story is an example of whats wrong with the news media and what I’d hope Wikitribune would avoid. Here’s what I mean–A senator at the meeting accused Trump of inappropriate language, which Trump and others at the meeting later denied. There’s no transcript. There’s no audio.

    So what kind of journalistic integrity is behind phrases like, “a source briefed on the conversation”? They weren’t present at the meeting, so not a witness, and with no statement of who they are, their position, and who briefed them. Its the same kind of nonsense sourcing that lets Time magazine run an article falsely claiming Trump removing a bust of MLK because the reporter didn’t recall seeing it, though did nothing beyond texting a friend to confirm the report.

    This isn’t about defending/attacking Trump. Its about standards of journalism that should transcend the current political moment.

    1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

      Agreed. We will be addressing the MLK bust thing in an item later today on Donald Trump and the media. It’s also notable of course that the White House is quite capable of using confidential briefings to communicate its own version of what might or might not have been said. On a more serious level if there isn’t a transcript or recording available it is necessary to try to track down the best version of what was said and in this case it looks like many people decided to deliberately try to obfuscate but there was no doubt of the tone – be the actual words, shithole or shithouse. Here’s how we updated the other piece and see if it makes it clearer while hopefully also understanding how abnormal a conversation like this is: https://www.wikitribune.com/story/2018/01/16/united_states/you-say-shithole-he-apparently-said-shithouse-shall-we-call-the-whole-thing-off/39501/

      1. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

        Thanks for taking these concerns seriously, Peter.

        I’m guessing this is the MLK bust article:
        https://www.wikitribune.com/story/2018/01/18/media/breakdown-trumps-fake-news-awards-what-would-yours-be/40049/#read

        A great example of reporting without editorializing. I hope to see more like this from WikiTribune and that it will restore trust and civility in the discourse surrounding current events.

  2. [ This comment is from a user you have muted ] (show)

    10/10
    Great coverage, this story is very important for Trump’s future

Subscribe to our newsletter

Be the first to collaborate on our developing articles

WikiTribune Open menu Close Search Like Back Next Open menu Close menu Play video RSS Feed Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Follow us on Instagram Follow us on Youtube Connect with us on Linkedin Connect with us on Discord Email us